Automated identification and tracking of cells in Cytometry of Reaction Rate Constant (CRRC).
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
14
11
2022
accepted:
28
02
2023
medline:
5
7
2023
pubmed:
3
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cytometry of Reaction Rate Constant (CRRC) is a method for studying cell-population heterogeneity using time-lapse fluorescence microscopy, which allows one to follow reaction kinetics in individual cells. The current and only CRRC workflow utilizes a single fluorescence image to manually identify cell contours which are then used to determine fluorescence intensity of individual cells in the entire time-stack of images. This workflow is only reliable if cells maintain their positions during the time-lapse measurements. If the cells move, the original cell contours become unsuitable for evaluating intracellular fluorescence and the CRRC experiment will be inaccurate. The requirement of invariant cell positions during a prolonged imaging is impossible to satisfy for motile cells. Here we report a CRRC workflow developed to be applicable to motile cells. The new workflow combines fluorescence microscopy with transmitted-light microscopy and utilizes a new automated tool for cell identification and tracking. A transmitted-light image is taken right before every fluorescence image to determine cell contours, and cell contours are tracked through the time-stack of transmitted-light images to account for cell movement. Each unique contour is used to determine fluorescence intensity of cells in the associated fluorescence image. Next, time dependencies of the intracellular fluorescence intensities are used to determine each cell's rate constant and construct a kinetic histogram "number of cells vs rate constant." The new workflow's robustness to cell movement was confirmed experimentally by conducting a CRRC study of cross-membrane transport in motile cells. The new workflow makes CRRC applicable to a wide range of cell types and eliminates the influence of cell motility on the accuracy of results. Additionally, the workflow could potentially monitor kinetics of varying biological processes at the single-cell level for sizable cell populations. Although our workflow was designed ad hoc for CRRC, this cell-segmentation/cell-tracking strategy also represents an entry-level, user-friendly option for a variety of biological assays (i.e., migration, proliferation assays, etc.). Importantly, no prior knowledge of informatics (i.e., training a model for deep learning) is required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37399195
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282990
pii: PONE-D-22-31376
pmc: PMC10317225
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0282990Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Nebbioso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
F1000Res. 2020 Oct 28;9:1279
pubmed: 33224481
Biophys J. 2007 Jun 15;92(12):4271-88
pubmed: 17384073
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 01;8(11):e79222
pubmed: 24223908
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
J Immunol Methods. 1981;43(3):269-75
pubmed: 7019344
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Mar 11;19(5):
pubmed: 30862101
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Apr 13;16(4):e1007673
pubmed: 32282792
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2018 Feb;34(2):
pubmed: 28755437
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41368
pubmed: 22848474
Anal Chem. 2019 Mar 19;91(6):4186-4194
pubmed: 30829484
Anal Chem. 2011 Aug 15;83(16):6132-4
pubmed: 21770449
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 5;2022:6003293
pubmed: 35422850
Anal Chem. 2020 Sep 15;92(18):12101-12110
pubmed: 32790291
Biophys J. 1995 Jul;69(1):30-41
pubmed: 7669907
Br J Cancer. 2011 May 24;104(11):1730-8
pubmed: 21559013
Nat Methods. 2012 Jun 28;9(7):676-82
pubmed: 22743772
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 8;15(12):e0243219
pubmed: 33290432
Cytometry. 2002 Jan 1;47(1):8-16
pubmed: 11774344
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 15;23(20):
pubmed: 36293228
J Biomed Sci. 2018 Mar 06;25(1):20
pubmed: 29506506
ACS Cent Sci. 2018 Aug 22;4(8):1045-1055
pubmed: 30159402
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 25;6:30420
pubmed: 27453091
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2016 Jun;12(6):633-44
pubmed: 27116192
Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 26;7(1):14135
pubmed: 29075007
Methods Mol Biol. 2006;320:85-90
pubmed: 16719376
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Oct 04;14:297
pubmed: 24090363
Anal Chem. 2013 Mar 5;85(5):2578-81
pubmed: 23394374
Cytometry A. 2020 Mar;97(3):226-240
pubmed: 31981309
Mol Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug;15(2):161
pubmed: 34295468
Bioconjug Chem. 2020 Feb 19;31(2):224-228
pubmed: 31738518
BMC Biol. 2022 Aug 5;20(1):174
pubmed: 35932043
Anal Chem. 2020 Jul 7;92(13):9348-9355
pubmed: 32522000
Cytometry A. 2018 Oct;93(10):1004-1018
pubmed: 30230197
Cytotechnology. 2016 Oct;68(5):2015-25
pubmed: 27488883
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Mar 25;14(4):6624-48
pubmed: 23528891
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0268297
pubmed: 35793313