Is the Citak classification of distal femur morphology age and gender dependent?
Aseptic loosening
Citak classification
Distal femoral morphology
Revision knee arthroplasty
Total knee arthroplasty
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
26
12
2022
accepted:
21
06
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
entrez:
3
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to compare the distal femur morphology in different age and gender groups using the Citak classification. All patients who had standard knee anteroposterior radiographs between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed using the electronic patient database. Patients were divided into three age groups as follows: young adults (Group I, younger than 50 years), middle-aged adults (Group II, ranging from age 51 to 73 years), and elderly (Group III, more than 74 years). From each age group, 80 patients were randomly selected with an equal number of gender (40 males/40 females). An age-stratified selection was applied to obtain the best sample that represents the selected age groups. Patients younger than 18 years of age, history of previous fracture or surgical procedure, those with fixation implants or prosthesis, and abnormalities of the lower limb, such as a congenital deformity, were excluded from the study. All measurements were performed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon familiar with the Citak classification. All measured variables were compared between age and gender groups. There were 240 patients (120 male and 120 female) with a mean age of 59.6 ± 20.4 (range 18-95). The distal femur morphology index was similar (p:0.811), and the morphological types were equally distributed among age groups (p:0.819). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between genders on the measured variables (p > 0.05 for all variables). Citak classification types were similarly distributed between the genders (p:0.153). No correlation was found between age and the Citak index in either gender (p:0.967 and p:0.633, respectively). Distal femoral morphology classified by the Citak index is not age and gender dependent. Type C, which has a wider diaphyseal diameter, and is supposed to be more common in elderly subjects, was equally distributed in all age groups. Level IV. Retrospective case series.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37400672
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04959-y
pii: 10.1007/s00402-023-04959-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6773-6779Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Maslaris A, Tsiridis E, Schoeneberg C et al (2022) Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z
doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z
pubmed: 36450936
pmcid: 9886614
Innocenti B, Bori E, Pianigiani S (2022) Biomechanical analysis of the use of stems in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9060259
doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9060259
pubmed: 35735502
pmcid: 9220056
Lee SH, Shih HN, Chang CH et al (2020) Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-3030-1
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3030-1
Levent A, Suero E, Gehrke T, Citak M (2021) Risk factors for aseptic loosening after total knee: a case-control study. J Bone Jt Surg 103:517–523
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00788
Citak M, Levent A, Suero EM et al (2022) A novel radiological classification system of the distal femur. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:315–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-03828-w
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03828-w
pubmed: 33638676
Akkaya M, Simsek ME, Akcaalan S et al (2021) Validity of the novel radiological classification system of the distal femur. Z Orthop Unfall. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1685-0955
doi: 10.1055/a-1685-0955
pubmed: 34879417
Lawrence D, Dorr MD, Faugere Marie-Claude, Mackel Audley M, Gruen Thomas A, Bognar Benedek, Hartmut H, Malluche M (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 3:231–242
Ahlborg HG, Johnell O, Karlsson MK (2004) An age-related medullary expansion can have implications for the long-term fixation of hip prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 75:154–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470412331294405
doi: 10.1080/00016470412331294405
pubmed: 15180230
Keshawarz NM, Recker RR (1984) Expansion of the medullary cavity at the expense of cortex in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Metab Bone Dis Relat Res 5:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0221-8747(84)90063-8
doi: 10.1016/0221-8747(84)90063-8
pubmed: 6493034
Salari N, Darvishi N, Bartina Y et al (2021) Global prevalence of osteoporosis among the world older adults: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02821-8
doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02821-8
Hendrickx G, Boudin E, Van Hul W (2015) A look behind the scenes: The risk and pathogenesis of primary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11:462–474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.48
doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.48
pubmed: 25900210
Lanham-New SA (2008) Importance of calcium, vitamin D and vitamin K for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Proc Nutr Soc 67:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665108007003
doi: 10.1017/S0029665108007003
pubmed: 18412990
Santos L, Elliott-Sale KJ, Sale C (2017) Exercise and bone health across the lifespan. Biogerontology 18:931–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-017-9732-6
doi: 10.1007/s10522-017-9732-6
pubmed: 29052784
pmcid: 5684300
Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D et al (2003) The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B 85:611–617. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.12843
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.85B4.12843
Nguyen BNT, Hoshino H, Togawa D, Matsuyama Y (2018) Cortical thickness index of the proximal femur: A radiographic parameter for preliminary assessment of bone mineral density and osteoporosis status in the age 50 years and over population. CiOS Clin Orthop Surg 10:149–156. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.149
doi: 10.4055/cios.2018.10.2.149
pubmed: 29854337
Stambough JB, Mason JB, Riesgo AM, Fehring TK (2018) Tapered modular fluted titanium stems for femoral fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 4:3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.006
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.03.006
pubmed: 29560387
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B (2006) Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury 37:691–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130
pubmed: 16814787
Myers P, Laboe P, Johnson KJ et al (2018) Patient mortality in geriatric distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 32:111–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001078
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001078
pubmed: 29462121
Canton G, Giraldi G, Dussi M, et al (2019) Osteoporotic distal femur fractures in the elderly: Peculiarities and treatment strategies. Acta Biomed 90:25–32. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8958
pubmed: 31821280
pmcid: 7233703