Radial scar appearances on contrast-enhanced mammography.
breast imaging
mammography
Journal
Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
ISSN: 1754-9485
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101469340
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
15
01
2023
accepted:
15
06
2023
medline:
24
8
2023
pubmed:
4
7
2023
entrez:
4
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With modern technological advances in imaging, radial scars are more frequently encountered in clinical practice. The management of radial scars remains challenging due to associated upgrade to malignancy at excision. Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) has a similar sensitivity compared to MRI in addition to lower cost, better availability and fewer contra-indications. CEM is reported to have an overall excellent negative predictive value for malignancy. In this study, imaging of 55 patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of radial scar since the introduction of CEM into local practice was reviewed. Nine patients underwent CEM as part of their diagnostic work-up and these appearances are presented as a pictorial essay to demonstrate enhancement patterns of radial scars on CEM in this cohort and consider how this knowledge may influence management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37401164
doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13554
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
514-518Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
Références
Cohen MA, Newell MS. Radial scars of the breast encountered at core biopsy: review of histologic, imaging, and management considerations. AJR 2017; 209: 1168-77.
Trombadori CML, D'Angelo A, Ferrara F, Santoro A, Belli P, Manfredi R. Radial scar: a management dilemma. Radiol Med 2021; 126: 774-85.
Alsharif S, Aldis A, Subahi A, El Khoury M, Mesurolle B. Breast MRI does not help differentiating radial scar with and without associated atypia or malignancy. Can Assoc Radiol J 2020; 72: 759-66.
Ghaderi KF, Phillips J, Perry H, Lotfi P, Mehta TS. Contrast enhanced mammography: current applications and future directions. Radiographics 2019; 39: 1907-20.
Bicchierai G, Nori J, De Benedetto D et al. Role of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in the post biopsy management of B3 lesions: preliminary results. Tumori J 2019; 105: 378-38.
Hobbs MM, Taylor DB, Buzynski S, Peake RE. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): patient preferences and tolerance. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2015; 59: 300-5.
Goh Y, Chan CW, Pillay P et al. Architecture distortion score (ADS) in malignancy risk stratification of architecture distortion on contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Eur Radiol 2021; 31: 2657-66.
Lee CH, Phillips J, Sung JS, Lewin JM, Newell MS. Contrast Enhanced Mammography (CEM): A Supplement to ACR BI-RADS Mammography 2013. Available from URL: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/RADS/BI-RADS/BIRADS_CEM_2022.pdf.
Savaridas SL, Tennant SL. Quantifying lesion enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: a review of published data. Clin Radiol 2022; 77: e313-20.