Randomized Trial of the Choosing Wisely Consumer Questions and a Shared Decision-Making Video Intervention on Decision-Making Outcomes.
decision making
health literacy
low-value care
patient participation
question prompt list, medical overuse
shared decision making
Journal
Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making
ISSN: 1552-681X
Titre abrégé: Med Decis Making
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8109073
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2023
08 2023
Historique:
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
5
7
2023
entrez:
5
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite widespread use, there are few studies evaluating the consumer Choosing Wisely questions. We evaluated the impact of the Choosing Wisely questions on consumers' decision-making outcomes. Adults living in Australia were presented with a hypothetical low-value care scenario. Using a 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design, they were randomized to either the Choosing Wisely questions ("Questions"), a shared decision-making (SDM) preparation video ("Video"), both interventions, or control (no intervention). Primary outcomes were 1) self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making and 2) intention to engage in SDM. A total of 1,439 participants (45.6% with "inadequate" health literacy) were eligible and included in the analysis. Intention to engage in SDM was higher in people randomized to the Video (mean difference [MD] = 0.24 [scale 0-6], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14, 0.35), Questions (MD = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.22), and both interventions (MD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44, The Choosing Wisely questions and a video to promote SDM may improve intention to engage in SDM and support patients in identifying questions that align with the Choosing Wisely campaign (with some additional benefits of the video intervention). ANZCTR376477. We conducted a randomized controlled trial online with adults living in Australia to test the effectiveness of the consumer Choosing Wisely questions and a shared decision-making (SDM) preparation video.Both interventions improved intention to engage in SDM and supported participants to identify questions that align with the Choosing Wisely campaign.There were some additional benefits of the Video intervention in reducing willingness to accept low-value treatment for low-back pain without asking questions; however, neither intervention changed participants' self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making nor affected perceptions of preparedness to engage in SDM or knowledge of rights to be involved in health care decision-making.The simple, low-cost nature of the interventions may make them appropriate for implementation within a suite of approaches to address low-value care at a population level.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite widespread use, there are few studies evaluating the consumer Choosing Wisely questions.
METHODS
We evaluated the impact of the Choosing Wisely questions on consumers' decision-making outcomes. Adults living in Australia were presented with a hypothetical low-value care scenario. Using a 2×2×2 between-subjects factorial design, they were randomized to either the Choosing Wisely questions ("Questions"), a shared decision-making (SDM) preparation video ("Video"), both interventions, or control (no intervention). Primary outcomes were 1) self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making and 2) intention to engage in SDM.
RESULTS
A total of 1,439 participants (45.6% with "inadequate" health literacy) were eligible and included in the analysis. Intention to engage in SDM was higher in people randomized to the Video (mean difference [MD] = 0.24 [scale 0-6], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.14, 0.35), Questions (MD = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.22), and both interventions (MD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.23-0.44,
CONCLUSIONS
The Choosing Wisely questions and a video to promote SDM may improve intention to engage in SDM and support patients in identifying questions that align with the Choosing Wisely campaign (with some additional benefits of the video intervention).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ANZCTR376477.
HIGHLIGHTS
We conducted a randomized controlled trial online with adults living in Australia to test the effectiveness of the consumer Choosing Wisely questions and a shared decision-making (SDM) preparation video.Both interventions improved intention to engage in SDM and supported participants to identify questions that align with the Choosing Wisely campaign.There were some additional benefits of the Video intervention in reducing willingness to accept low-value treatment for low-back pain without asking questions; however, neither intervention changed participants' self-efficacy to ask questions and be involved in decision-making nor affected perceptions of preparedness to engage in SDM or knowledge of rights to be involved in health care decision-making.The simple, low-cost nature of the interventions may make them appropriate for implementation within a suite of approaches to address low-value care at a population level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37403779
doi: 10.1177/0272989X231184461
pmc: PMC10422858
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
642-655Références
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0209863
pubmed: 30653531
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Mar;94(3):291-309
pubmed: 24305642
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):990-5
pubmed: 24979166
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jun 3;3(6):e221629
pubmed: 36219019
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Jan;78(1):130-3
pubmed: 19560303
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 11;9:23743735221092623
pubmed: 35434292
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):561-6
pubmed: 18335281
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):514-22
pubmed: 16338915
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1160-8
pubmed: 26364752
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 14;9(11):e033126
pubmed: 31727667
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):167-74
pubmed: 25552584
JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513-6
pubmed: 22419800
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Apr;61(1):56-64
pubmed: 16533677
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2629-37
pubmed: 25041071
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e031831
pubmed: 31467057
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Nov 01;30(9):736-739
pubmed: 29741672
Int J Nurs Pract. 2002 Apr;8(2):106-15
pubmed: 11993577
BMJ. 2014 May 14;348:g3178
pubmed: 25134115
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1024-1058
pubmed: 34402553
Prev Med. 2012 Nov;55(5):514-20
pubmed: 22935645
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Dec 24;:
pubmed: 33361344
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):687-691
pubmed: 28600453
BMJ. 2019 Nov 5;367:l6317
pubmed: 31690578
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 19;7:CD006732
pubmed: 30025154
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;285:114255
pubmed: 34391966