Progestin plus metformin improves outcomes in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer more than progestin alone: a meta-analysis.


Journal

Frontiers in endocrinology
ISSN: 1664-2392
Titre abrégé: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555782

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 07 01 2023
accepted: 31 05 2023
medline: 10 7 2023
pubmed: 7 7 2023
entrez: 7 7 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Progestin based therapy is the preferred option for fertility-sparing treatment of reproductive-age women with preserved fertility in endometrial hyperplasia (EH) or early endometrial cancer (EEC). Our objective was to investigate whether metformin could enhance the efficacy of progestin-based therapies by meta-analysis. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized or non-randomized controlled trials by searching of PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Cochrane database from inception to November 8, 2022. The results of enrolled studies were pooled using meta-analysis to estimate the effect of progestin plus metformin on remission, recurrence, pregnancy rate and live birth rate. In the analysis of progestin administered systemically or locally, complete response (CR) was significantly higher in progestin plus metformin versus progestin alone in the EH group (pooled OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.29 to 3.34, P=0.003), in the EEC group (pooled OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.05, P=0.01), but not in EEC and EH group (pooled OR 1.46, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.21, P=0.07). In the analysis of progestin administered systemically, complete response was improved in progestin plus metformin versus progestin alone, in the EH group (pooled OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.45 to 4.21, P=0.0009), in the EEC group (pooled OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.18 to 3.71, P=0.01), and in the EEC and EH group (pooled OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.54, P=0.01). The relapse rates of patients with EEC and EH were not different (pooled OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.20, P=0.13). For obstetric outcomes, the addition of metformin improved pregnancy rate (pooled OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.42, P=0.05), but not live birth rate (pooled OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.01, P=0.89). For fertility-sparing management, compared to progestin alone, the outcomes of patients with endometrial hyperplasia and early endometrial cancer were more improved with progestin plus metformin because progestin plus metformin increases the rate of remission and pregnancy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37415671
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1139858
pmc: PMC10320576
doi:

Substances chimiques

Progestins 0
Metformin 9100L32L2N
Steroids 0

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1139858

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Shao, Li and Zhao.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Int J Mol Med. 2020 Feb;45(2):623-633
pubmed: 31894313
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Mar 01;22(3):983-989
pubmed: 33773565
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 Feb;21(2):213-21
pubmed: 21270604
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 27;10:CD012214
pubmed: 29077194
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Oct;147(1):167-180
pubmed: 28760367
Endocr Rev. 2009 Feb;30(1):1-50
pubmed: 19056992
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(37):e8034
pubmed: 28906392
J Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Nov;30(6):e90
pubmed: 31576686
Chin Med J (Engl). 2022 Feb 9;135(5):584-590
pubmed: 35143424
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 6;2022:1961016
pubmed: 35854762
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2011 Sep;126(3-5):113-20
pubmed: 21168492
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):795-801
pubmed: 33812697
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 28;10(2):e035416
pubmed: 32114477
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959 Apr;22(4):719-48
pubmed: 13655060
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Fertil Steril. 2014 Mar;101(3):785-94
pubmed: 24388202
J Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(3):214-20
pubmed: 25045434
Ann Oncol. 2016 Feb;27(2):262-6
pubmed: 26578736
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Jun;50(6):101863
pubmed: 32652300
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Apr;161(1):143-151
pubmed: 33762086
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1331-1339
pubmed: 32376736
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 May;157(2):348-356
pubmed: 32085863
Hum Reprod Update. 2021 Apr 21;27(3):584-618
pubmed: 33302299
J Gynecol Oncol. 2023 May;34(3):e38
pubmed: 36659833
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Dec;139(3):424-8
pubmed: 26428941
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;14(9):
pubmed: 35565299
Biomed Pharmacother. 2019 May;113:108712
pubmed: 30849641
BJOG. 2020 Jun;127(7):848-857
pubmed: 31961463
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Nov 29;12(12):
pubmed: 33260382
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Dec;31(12):1499-1505
pubmed: 34785524
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 30;13:849794
pubmed: 35846327

Auteurs

Fengping Shao (F)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Yinguang Li (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Yunhe Zhao (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH