Sex differences in myocardial remodeling and extracellular volume in aortic regurgitation.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 07 2023
13 07 2023
Historique:
received:
15
08
2022
accepted:
21
06
2023
medline:
17
7
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
13
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Whether sex differences exist in the cardiac remodeling related to aortic regurgitation (AR) is unclear. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the current non-invasive reference standard for cardiac remodeling assessment and can evaluate tissue characteristics. This prospective cohort included patients with AR undergoing CMR between 2011 and 2020. We excluded patients with confounding causes of remodeling. We quantified left ventricular (LV) volume, mass, AR severity, replacement fibrosis by late Gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and extracellular expansion by extracellular volume fraction (ECV). We studied 280 patients (109 women), median age 59.5 (47.2, 68.6) years (P for age = 0.25 between sexes). Women had smaller absolute LV volume and mass than men across the spectrum of regurgitation volume (RVol) (P ≤ 0.01). In patients with ≥ moderate AR and with adjustment for body surface area, indexed LV end-diastolic volume and mass were not significantly different between sexes (all P > 0.5) but men had larger indexed LV end systolic volume and lower LV ejection fraction (P ≥ 0.01). Women were more likely to have NYHA class II or greater symptoms than men but underwent surgery at a similar rate. Prevalence and extent of LGE was not significantly different between sexes or across RVol. Increasing RVol was independently associated with increasing ECV in women, but not in men (adjusted P for interaction = 0.03). In conclusion, women had lower LV volumes and mass than men across AR severity but their ECV increased with higher regurgitant volume, while ECV did not change in men. Indexing to body surface area did not fully correct for the cardiac remodeling differences between men and women. Women were more likely to have symptoms but underwent surgery at a similar rate to men. Further research is needed to determine if differences in ECV would translate to differences in the course of AR and outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37443191
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37444-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-37444-y
pmc: PMC10344872
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Gadolinium
AU0V1LM3JT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
11334Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Circulation. 1977 Mar;55(3):504-8
pubmed: 138491
Circulation. 1990 Sep;82(3):1051-3
pubmed: 2393991
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 May 01;15:35
pubmed: 23634753
Circulation. 1989 Apr;79(4):744-55
pubmed: 2522356
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(12):e009535
pubmed: 31838882
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Apr 18;17:29
pubmed: 25928314
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Mar 15;83(6):897-902
pubmed: 10190406
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 10;63(22):e57-185
pubmed: 24603191
Circulation. 1988 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):1108-20
pubmed: 2972417
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jul 20;56(4):278-87
pubmed: 20633819
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;13(3):699-711
pubmed: 31422128
Circulation. 1996 Nov 15;94(10):2472-8
pubmed: 8921790
Cardiology. 1998 Oct;90(2):101-9
pubmed: 9778546
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Feb 22;24(1):12
pubmed: 35193584
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 21;72(8):823-834
pubmed: 30115220
Am J Cardiol. 1997 Aug 15;80(4):475-80
pubmed: 9285661
Heart Fail Clin. 2006 Oct;2(4):415-24
pubmed: 17448428
Am J Cardiol. 1978 Apr;41(4):661-9
pubmed: 645569
J Heart Valve Dis. 2003 Sep;12(5):592-600
pubmed: 14565712
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Nov;14(11):2170-2182
pubmed: 34274265
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Apr;9(4):388-96
pubmed: 27056158
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Jul;11(7):962-973
pubmed: 29153564
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Jun;14(6):1146-1160
pubmed: 33341409
Circulation. 2019 Dec 17;140(25):2122-2124
pubmed: 31841370
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;68(20):2144-2153
pubmed: 27855803
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 16;73(14):1741-1752
pubmed: 30846339
Circulation. 1991 Oct;84(4):1625-35
pubmed: 1914102
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984 Apr;3(4):916-23
pubmed: 6707357
Circulation. 2002 Apr 16;105(15):1837-42
pubmed: 11956128
Am J Cardiol. 1975 May;35(5):725-39
pubmed: 1124729
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015 Jun 11;17:48
pubmed: 26062931
PeerJ. 2019 Aug 5;7:e7461
pubmed: 31404429
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 1;62(14):1280-1287
pubmed: 23871886
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec;9(23):e018731
pubmed: 33241753
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):96-105
pubmed: 29248646
Circulation. 1999 Apr 13;99(14):1851-7
pubmed: 10199882
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Apr;14(4):812-822
pubmed: 33341417
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):W630-5
pubmed: 17114517