Protonation-State Dependence of Hydration and Interactions in the Two Proton-Conducting Channels of Cytochrome c Oxidase.
Cytochrome c Oxidase
molecular dynamics simulations
protonation and hydration
Journal
International journal of molecular sciences
ISSN: 1422-0067
Titre abrégé: Int J Mol Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101092791
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jun 2023
21 Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
21
05
2023
revised:
07
06
2023
accepted:
09
06
2023
medline:
17
7
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
14
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cytochrome c Oxidase (CcO), a membrane protein of the respiratory chain, pumps protons against an electrochemical gradient by using the energy of oxygen reduction to water. The ("chemical") protons required for this reaction and those pumped are taken up via two distinct channels, named D-channel and K-channel, in a step-wise and highly regulated fashion. In the reductive phase of the catalytic cycle, both channels transport protons so that the pumped proton passes the D-channel before the "chemical" proton has crossed the K-channel. By performing molecular dynamics simulations of CcO in the O→E redox state (after the arrival of the first reducing electron) with various combinations of protonation states of the D- and K-channels, we analysed the effect of protonation on the two channels. In agreement with previous work, the amount of water observed in the D-channel was significantly higher when the terminal residue E286 was not (yet) protonated than when the proton arrived at this end of the D-channel and E286 was neutral. Since a sufficient number of water molecules in the channel is necessary for proton transport, this can be understood as E286 facilitating its own protonation. K-channel hydration shows an even higher dependence on the location of the excess proton in the K-channel. Also in agreement with previous work, the K-channel exhibits a very low hydration level that likely hinders proton transfer when the excess proton is located in the lower part of the K-channel, that is, on the N-side of S365. Once the proton has passed S365 (towards the reaction site, the bi-nuclear centre (BNC)), the amount of water in the K-channel provides hydrogen-bond connectivity that renders proton transfer up to Y288 at the BNC feasible. No significant direct effect of the protonation state of one channel on the hydration level, hydrogen-bond connectivity, or interactions between protein residues in the other channel could be observed, rendering proton conductivity in the two channels independent of each other. Regulation of the order of proton uptake and proton passage in the two channels such that the "chemical" proton leaves its channel last must, therefore, be achieved by other means of communication, such as the location of the reducing electron.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37445646
pii: ijms241310464
doi: 10.3390/ijms241310464
pmc: PMC10341450
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Electron Transport Complex IV
EC 1.9.3.1
Protons
0
Water
059QF0KO0R
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
ID : CRC 1078
Références
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Jun 5;1604(2):61-5
pubmed: 12765763
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Aug 19;94(17):9085-90
pubmed: 9256439
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2023 Apr 1;1864(2):148933
pubmed: 36403794
Nature. 1992 Mar 26;356(6367):301-9
pubmed: 1312679
J Phys Chem B. 1998 Apr 30;102(18):3586-616
pubmed: 24889800
J Membr Biol. 2018 Jun;251(3):299-314
pubmed: 29435610
Chem Rev. 2018 Mar 14;118(5):2469-2490
pubmed: 29350917
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Sep 20;119(38):e2207761119
pubmed: 36095184
Biophys J. 1996 May;70(5):2043-51
pubmed: 9172729
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Feb 20;104(8):2685-90
pubmed: 17293458
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Dec;1837(12):1998-2003
pubmed: 25149865
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010 Jun-Jul;1797(6-7):619-24
pubmed: 20307488
Biomolecules. 2022 Nov 01;12(11):
pubmed: 36358964
Chem Sci. 2018 Jul 9;9(32):6703-6710
pubmed: 30310604
Biochemistry. 1998 Feb 24;37(8):2470-6
pubmed: 9485395
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7420-5
pubmed: 27339133
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16117-22
pubmed: 17050688
Biochemistry. 1998 Mar 3;37(9):3053-61
pubmed: 9485458
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8
pubmed: 8744570
Biophys J. 2017 Aug 22;113(4):817-828
pubmed: 28834718
Biochemistry. 2009 Jun 16;48(23):5121-30
pubmed: 19397279
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 6;114(23):5924-5929
pubmed: 28536198
J Chem Inf Model. 2017 Feb 27;57(2):256-266
pubmed: 28095694
Acta Physiol Scand Suppl. 1998 Aug;643:7-16
pubmed: 9789542
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 17;112(7):2040-5
pubmed: 25646428
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1781-802
pubmed: 16222654
Biochim Biophys Acta Bioenerg. 2018 Sep;1859(9):692-698
pubmed: 29567353
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jun 17;114(23):7830-43
pubmed: 20496934