First Generation of a Modular Interoperable Closed-Loop System for Automated Insulin Delivery in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Lessons From Trials and Real-Life Data.
artificial pancreas
automated insulin delivery
closed-loop
type 1 diabetes
Journal
Journal of diabetes science and technology
ISSN: 1932-2968
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306166
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
14
07
2024
medline:
2
11
2023
pubmed:
14
7
2023
entrez:
14
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
DBLG1 (Diabeloop Generation 1) stands as one of the five commercially available closed-loop solution worldwide for patients with type 1 diabetes as of 2023. Our aim was to provide an overview of all data obtained with this system regarding outcomes and populations, with an emphasis on interoperability. This report includes all available sources of data (three randomized control trials and five surveys on real-life data). Collection ran from March 3, 2017 to April 30, 2022. We gathered data from 6859 adult patients treated with closed-loop from three to 12 months. Overall, all sources of data showed that time in range (TIR) 70 to 180 mg/dL, starting from 47.4% to 56.6%, improved from 12.2 to 17.3 percentage points. Time in hypoglycemia was reduced by 48% in average (range: 26%-70%) and reached a level of 1.3% in the largest and most recent cohort. In patients with excessive time in hypoglycemia at baseline (≥5%), closed-loop allowed a reduction in time below range (TBR) by 59%. The comparison of days with declared physical activity versus days without physical activity did not show differences in TBR. The improvement in TIR observed with three different pump systems (Vicentra Kaleido, n = 117; Sooil Dana-I, n = 84; and Roche Insight, n = 6684) ranged from 15.4 to 17.3 percentage points. These data obtained in different European countries were consistent throughout all reports, showing that this closed-loop system is efficient (high improvement in TIR), safe (remarkably low level of TBR), and interoperable (three pump settings so far).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
DBLG1 (Diabeloop Generation 1) stands as one of the five commercially available closed-loop solution worldwide for patients with type 1 diabetes as of 2023. Our aim was to provide an overview of all data obtained with this system regarding outcomes and populations, with an emphasis on interoperability.
METHODS
This report includes all available sources of data (three randomized control trials and five surveys on real-life data). Collection ran from March 3, 2017 to April 30, 2022.
RESULTS
We gathered data from 6859 adult patients treated with closed-loop from three to 12 months. Overall, all sources of data showed that time in range (TIR) 70 to 180 mg/dL, starting from 47.4% to 56.6%, improved from 12.2 to 17.3 percentage points. Time in hypoglycemia was reduced by 48% in average (range: 26%-70%) and reached a level of 1.3% in the largest and most recent cohort. In patients with excessive time in hypoglycemia at baseline (≥5%), closed-loop allowed a reduction in time below range (TBR) by 59%. The comparison of days with declared physical activity versus days without physical activity did not show differences in TBR. The improvement in TIR observed with three different pump systems (Vicentra Kaleido, n = 117; Sooil Dana-I, n = 84; and Roche Insight, n = 6684) ranged from 15.4 to 17.3 percentage points.
DISCUSSION
These data obtained in different European countries were consistent throughout all reports, showing that this closed-loop system is efficient (high improvement in TIR), safe (remarkably low level of TBR), and interoperable (three pump settings so far).
Identifiants
pubmed: 37449762
doi: 10.1177/19322968231186976
pmc: PMC10658690
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insulin
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Blood Glucose
0
Insulin, Regular, Human
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1433-1439Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: PYB, SF, and GC are consultants for Diabeloop SA. AA is employee from Diabeloop SA. No author has been paid to write this article, and the findings and conclusions in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the sponsors. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Références
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Jun;25(6):1607-1613
pubmed: 36751978
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Sep;24(9):672-674
pubmed: 35604800
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Aug;24(8):588-591
pubmed: 35020488
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Dec;58(12):1709-1711
pubmed: 34272606
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1321-1329
pubmed: 30292578
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S73-S84
pubmed: 33298417
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 8;387(10):869-881
pubmed: 36069869
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Sep;23(9):2170-2176
pubmed: 34009725
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Jun 16;108(7):1614-1623
pubmed: 36734145
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 May;24(5):956-961
pubmed: 35099098
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Apr;25(4):242-249
pubmed: 36724301
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Mar;24(3):178-189
pubmed: 34694909
Diabetes Care. 2021 Mar;44(3):844-846
pubmed: 33431420
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Feb;24(2):113-119
pubmed: 34524003
Diabetes Care. 2019 Aug;42(8):1593-1603
pubmed: 31177185
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1630-1640
pubmed: 34099518
Acta Diabetol. 2018 Jun;55(6):549-556
pubmed: 29520615
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Jan;23(1):186-194
pubmed: 33001536
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Mar;4(3):e158-e168
pubmed: 35216750
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1707-1717
pubmed: 31618560
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep 29;:19322968221128565
pubmed: 36172702
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Sep;23(9):601-608
pubmed: 33784196
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 May;1(1):e17-e25
pubmed: 33323237
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Jan;17(1):176-185
pubmed: 34658265
N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 29;387(13):1161-1172
pubmed: 36170500