The age profile of respiratory syncytial virus burden in preschool children of low- and middle-income countries: A semi-parametric, meta-regression approach.
Journal
PLoS medicine
ISSN: 1549-1676
Titre abrégé: PLoS Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101231360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2023
07 2023
Historique:
received:
08
01
2023
accepted:
30
05
2023
revised:
31
07
2023
medline:
3
8
2023
pubmed:
17
7
2023
entrez:
17
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections are among the primary causes of death for children under 5 years of age worldwide. A notable challenge with many of the upcoming prophylactic interventions against RSV is their short duration of protection, making the age profile of key interest to the design of prevention strategies. We leverage the RSV data collected on cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in a systematic review in combination with flexible generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) to characterize the age burden of RSV incidence, hospitalization, and hospital-based case fatality rate (hCFR). Due to the flexible nature of GAMMs, we estimate the peak, median, and mean incidence of infection to inform discussions on the ideal "window of protection" of prophylactic interventions. In a secondary analysis, we reestimate the burden of RSV in all low- and middle-income countries. The peak age of community-based incidence is 4.8 months, and the mean and median age of infection is 18.9 and 14.7 months, respectively. Estimating the age profile using the incidence coming from hospital-based studies yields a slightly younger age profile, in which the peak age of infection is 2.6 months and the mean and median age of infection are 15.8 and 11.6 months, respectively. More severe outcomes, such as hospitalization and in-hospital death have a younger age profile. Children under 6 months of age constitute 10% of the population under 5 years of age but bear 20% to 29% of cases, 28% to 39% of hospitalizations, and 38% to 50% of deaths. On an average year, we estimate 28.23 to 31.34 million cases of RSV, between 2.95 to 3.35 million hospitalizations, and 16,835 to 19,909 in-hospital deaths in low, lower- and upper middle-income countries. In addition, we estimate 17,254 to 23,875 deaths in the community, for a total of 34,114 to 46,485 deaths. Globally, evidence shows that community-based incidence may differ by World Bank Income Group, but not hospital-based incidence, probability of hospitalization, or the probability of in-hospital death (p ≤ 0.01, p = 1, p = 0.86, 0.63, respectively). Our study is limited mainly due to the sparsity of the data, especially for low-income countries (LICs). The lack of information for some populations makes detecting heterogeneity between income groups difficult, and differences in access to care may impact the reported burden. We have demonstrated an approach to synthesize information on RSV outcomes in a statistically principled manner, and we estimate that the age profile of RSV burden depends on whether information on incidence is collected in hospitals or in the community. Our results suggest that the ideal prophylactic strategy may require multiple products to avert the risk among preschool children.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections are among the primary causes of death for children under 5 years of age worldwide. A notable challenge with many of the upcoming prophylactic interventions against RSV is their short duration of protection, making the age profile of key interest to the design of prevention strategies.
METHODS AND FINDINGS
We leverage the RSV data collected on cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in a systematic review in combination with flexible generalized additive mixed models (GAMMs) to characterize the age burden of RSV incidence, hospitalization, and hospital-based case fatality rate (hCFR). Due to the flexible nature of GAMMs, we estimate the peak, median, and mean incidence of infection to inform discussions on the ideal "window of protection" of prophylactic interventions. In a secondary analysis, we reestimate the burden of RSV in all low- and middle-income countries. The peak age of community-based incidence is 4.8 months, and the mean and median age of infection is 18.9 and 14.7 months, respectively. Estimating the age profile using the incidence coming from hospital-based studies yields a slightly younger age profile, in which the peak age of infection is 2.6 months and the mean and median age of infection are 15.8 and 11.6 months, respectively. More severe outcomes, such as hospitalization and in-hospital death have a younger age profile. Children under 6 months of age constitute 10% of the population under 5 years of age but bear 20% to 29% of cases, 28% to 39% of hospitalizations, and 38% to 50% of deaths. On an average year, we estimate 28.23 to 31.34 million cases of RSV, between 2.95 to 3.35 million hospitalizations, and 16,835 to 19,909 in-hospital deaths in low, lower- and upper middle-income countries. In addition, we estimate 17,254 to 23,875 deaths in the community, for a total of 34,114 to 46,485 deaths. Globally, evidence shows that community-based incidence may differ by World Bank Income Group, but not hospital-based incidence, probability of hospitalization, or the probability of in-hospital death (p ≤ 0.01, p = 1, p = 0.86, 0.63, respectively). Our study is limited mainly due to the sparsity of the data, especially for low-income countries (LICs). The lack of information for some populations makes detecting heterogeneity between income groups difficult, and differences in access to care may impact the reported burden.
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated an approach to synthesize information on RSV outcomes in a statistically principled manner, and we estimate that the age profile of RSV burden depends on whether information on incidence is collected in hospitals or in the community. Our results suggest that the ideal prophylactic strategy may require multiple products to avert the risk among preschool children.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37459352
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004250
pii: PMEDICINE-D-23-00070
pmc: PMC10389726
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1004250Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Antillón et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: LW received grants from Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) during the conduct of the study and fees from Pfizer outside the submitted work for discussions on economic evaluation, for a total of <€3000 combined, fully paid directly to the University of Antwerp. PB reports a grant from the Respiratory Syncytial Virus Consortium in Europe (RESCEU), Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 of the European Commission, Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No 116019, during the conduct of the study; and outside the submitted work he reports grants from Pfizer, GSK, Merck and the Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 of the European Commission (N° 101034339 project PROMISE: Preparing for RSV immunisation and surveillance in Europe) as well as consultancy fees.
Références
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76180
pubmed: 24146835
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2022 Sep;16(5):926-936
pubmed: 35733362
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 30;11(9):e0163567
pubmed: 27689356
Lancet. 2019 Aug 31;394(10200):757-779
pubmed: 31257127
J Infect Dis. 1991 Apr;163(4):693-8
pubmed: 2010624
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Nov 1;176(9):794-802
pubmed: 23059788
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 2;73(Suppl_3):S229-S237
pubmed: 34472576
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0177803
pubmed: 28531224
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 30;383(5):426-439
pubmed: 32726529
JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(3):204-206
pubmed: 34964806
Lancet. 2010 May 1;375(9725):1545-55
pubmed: 20399493
Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Nov;18(11):1191-1210
pubmed: 30243584
Vaccine. 2015 Apr 8;33(15):1797-801
pubmed: 25725445
J Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 15;210(10):1582-9
pubmed: 24903663
J Infect Dis. 2022 Aug 12;226(Suppl 1):S79-S86
pubmed: 34908153
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 24;11(4):e046563
pubmed: 33895717
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 6;18(1):82
pubmed: 32248817
J Med Virol. 2022 Dec;94(12):5802-5807
pubmed: 35961780
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Aug 15;59(4):560-8
pubmed: 24799324
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 20;40(26):5853-5870
pubmed: 34428309
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1999 May;43(5):1183-8
pubmed: 10223933
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Sep 2;13(9):2138-2149
pubmed: 28605249
Elife. 2021 Nov 25;10:
pubmed: 34821551
Vaccine. 2014 Aug 20;32(37):4726-9
pubmed: 25005882
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 3;386(9):837-846
pubmed: 35235726
Vaccine. 2021 Aug 16;39(35):5037-5045
pubmed: 34325934
Lancet. 2017 Sep 2;390(10098):946-958
pubmed: 28689664
BMC Med. 2020 Nov 18;18(1):348
pubmed: 33203423
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Feb;98(2):360-363
pubmed: 29210350
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Oct;5(10):e984-e991
pubmed: 28911764
Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:405-17
pubmed: 26356803
PLoS One. 2009 Dec 02;4(12):e8088
pubmed: 19956576
Vaccine. 2020 Jul 14;38(33):5139-5147
pubmed: 32586761
Nat Rev Immunol. 2022 Oct;22(10):589-590
pubmed: 35831610
PLoS Med. 2008 Mar 25;5(3):e74
pubmed: 18366252
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2018 Sep;37(9):886-892
pubmed: 29373476
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2023 Mar-Apr;99 Suppl 1:S4-S11
pubmed: 36402228
BMC Med. 2015 Mar 10;13:49
pubmed: 25857701