Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor combinations in first-line metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
androgen antagonists
castration-resistant
poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors
prostatic neoplasms
survival
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2023
Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
29
11
2023
pubmed:
18
7
2023
entrez:
18
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) among patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) receiving a combination of first-line poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) plus androgen receptor axis-targeted agents (ARAT) vs placebo/ARAT. We conducted a systematic review/meta-analysis of all published Phase III randomised controlled trials using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane (inception until 6 June 2023). Published full-text manuscripts and conference abstracts were inclusion eligible. Study selection/data extraction were independently performed by two authors. The Cochrane Risk-of-Bias 2 Tool was used, and certainty of evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and relative risks, with corresponding confidence intervals (CIs), were generated using random-effects models. Three trials were identified: PROpel, MAGNITUDE, and TALAPRO-2. Compared to placebo/ARAT, the PARPi/ARAT combination was associated with a 35% rPFS improvement in the overall cohort (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.76), with 68%, 45%, and 26% improvements in the BReast CAncer gene 1/gene 2 (BRCA1/2)-mutated (BRCA1/2m; P < 0.001), homologous recombination repair-mutated (HRRm; P < 0.001), and non-HRRm cohorts (P = 0.003), respectively. OS data maturity ranged from 31% to 48%, with overall cohort OS data unavailable from MAGNITUDE. The PROpel/TALAPRO-2 pooled analysis demonstrated a 16% OS improvement in the overall cohort (HR 0.84, 95 CI 0.72-0.98; P = 0.02). OS in the HRRm (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.95) and the BRCA1/2m cohorts (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.18-1.56) were improved, with a higher effect magnitude compared to the overall cohort. This combination was associated with a 45% relative risk increase in Grade ≥3 TEAEs, including 6.22-fold for Grade ≥3 anaemia (31.9% vs 4.9%). The addition of PARPi to ARAT in the first-line mCRPC setting is associated with rPFS benefits across subgroups, with the greatest magnitude of benefit in BRCA1/2m patients. OS benefits remain inconsistent irrespective of HRRm status, with significant increases in Grade ≥3 TEAEs, particularly anaemia. Currently, we suggest this combined approach be selectively offered to HRRm patients, preferentially BRCA1/2m.
Substances chimiques
BRCA1 protein, human
0
BRCA1 Protein
0
Ribose
681HV46001
BRCA2 protein, human
0
BRCA2 Protein
0
Adenosine Diphosphate
61D2G4IYVH
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
619-630Informations de copyright
© 2023 BJU International.
Références
Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS et al. Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 138-148
Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf D et al. Enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: extended analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study. Eur Urol 2017; 71(2): 151-154
Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1502-1512
Robinson D, Van Allen EM, Wu Y et al. Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer. Cell 2015; 161: 1215-1228
Clarke NW, Armstrong AJ, Thiery-Vuillemin A et al. Abiraterone and olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 1.
Agarwal N, Azad A, Carles J et al. Talazoparib plus enzalutamide in men with first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TALAPRO-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023; 402: 291-303.
De Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2091-2102
Abida W, Patnaik A, Campbell D et al. Rucaparib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene alteration. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 3763-3772
Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN et al. Rucaparib or physician's choice in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 719-732
Asim M, Tarish F, Zecchini HI et al. Synthetic lethality between androgen receptor signalling and the PARP pathway in prostate cancer. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 374
Schiewer MJ, Goodwin JF, Han S et al. Dual roles of PARP-1 promote cancer growth and progression. Cancer Discov 2012; 2: 1134-1149
Li L, Karanika S, Yang G et al. Androgen receptor inhibitor-induced “BRCAness” and PARP inhibition are synthetically lethal for castration-resistant prostate cancer. Sci Signal 2017; 10: eaam7479
Clarke N, Wiechno P, Alekseev B et al. Olaparib combined with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 975-986
Clarke NW, Armstrong AJ, Thiery-Vuillemin A et al. Final overall survival (OS) in PROpel: abiraterone (abi) and olaparib (Ola) versus abiraterone and placebo (pbo) as first-line (1L) therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41(Suppl 6): abstr LBA16
Chi KN, Rathkopf DE, Smith MR et al. Niraparib and abiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 3339-3351
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228-247
Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM et al. Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Updated recommendations from the prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 1402-1418
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 383-394
LaFargue CJ, Dal Molin GZ, Sood AK, Coleman RL. Exploring and comparing adverse events between PARP inhibitors. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: e15-e28
Xie W, Regan MM, Buyse M et al. Event-free survival, a prostate-specific antigen-based composite end point, is not a surrogate for overall survival in men with localized prostate cancer treated with radiation. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 3032-3041
Herrera CD, Guerra CE, Narayan V et al. Financial toxicity in prostate cancer survivors: a national cross-sectional assessment of subjective financial burden. Urol Oncol 2023; 41: 105.e1-105.e8
Min A, Im S. PARP inhibitors as therapeutics: beyond modulation of PARylation. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 394
Sun K, Mikule K, Wang Z et al. A comparative pharmacokinetic study of PARP inhibitors demonstrates favorable properties for niraparib efficacy in preclinical tumor models. Oncotarget 2018; 9: 37080-37096