"Such an institution represents the circle of life" - bringing an inpatient hospice into an academic setting: a pre-implementation exploratory study.
End-of-life care
Hospice
Palliative medicine
Prospective study
Qualitative research
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jul 2023
19 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
26
09
2022
accepted:
30
06
2023
medline:
21
7
2023
pubmed:
19
7
2023
entrez:
18
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To combine the benefits of hospice and palliative care, the integration of both seems self-evident. Aim of this study was to explore clinical staff's and volunteers' expectations and concerns of the first university hospice in Germany planning for implementation. Staff and volunteers of the Department of Palliative Medicine of the University Hospital in Cologne received questionnaires and were interviewed following three themes of interest: opportunities, challenges, general criteria. Questionnaire results were analyzed descriptively using mean ± SD and percentages, open-ended questions and interviews were analysed using content analysis. A total of 28/100 questionnaires was returned (n = 17 clinical staff, n = 11 volunteers) and 18 interviews conducted. The majority of both clinical staff and volunteers estimated the need for a university inpatient hospice as rather to very high (64.7% and 81.8%, respectively). Our findings revealed that most clinical staff and volunteers anticipated improvements with the intended university inpatient hospice, although their expectations were divided between both hope and concern while adhering to legal and general requirements, which they feared might oppose such a project. Participants expressed concern about leadership and staffing plans, albeit most pronounced among clinical staff. Nursing staff repeatedly articulated concerns about being interchanged between the palliative care ward and the intended inpatient hospice while they had explicitly chosen to work in palliative medicine. The overall high level of anticipated progress and excitement is very encouraging. Albeit serious concerns were mentioned, our results indicate that all participants believe in a positive impact and highlight the need of developing a solid concept. In order to implement such a hospice within a university setting, it is important to consider multilevel contextual factors such as system-level factors (funding, external and internal regulations), organization-level factors (leadership, staff motivation), and patient-level factors (adaptability to patients' needs). Our findings illustrate the importance of understanding the context of practice before implementation. Our pre-implementation study helps identify critical views from staff members and volunteers that may hinder or advance the implementation. The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (#DRKS00021258) on April 17
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To combine the benefits of hospice and palliative care, the integration of both seems self-evident. Aim of this study was to explore clinical staff's and volunteers' expectations and concerns of the first university hospice in Germany planning for implementation.
METHODS
METHODS
Staff and volunteers of the Department of Palliative Medicine of the University Hospital in Cologne received questionnaires and were interviewed following three themes of interest: opportunities, challenges, general criteria. Questionnaire results were analyzed descriptively using mean ± SD and percentages, open-ended questions and interviews were analysed using content analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 28/100 questionnaires was returned (n = 17 clinical staff, n = 11 volunteers) and 18 interviews conducted. The majority of both clinical staff and volunteers estimated the need for a university inpatient hospice as rather to very high (64.7% and 81.8%, respectively). Our findings revealed that most clinical staff and volunteers anticipated improvements with the intended university inpatient hospice, although their expectations were divided between both hope and concern while adhering to legal and general requirements, which they feared might oppose such a project. Participants expressed concern about leadership and staffing plans, albeit most pronounced among clinical staff. Nursing staff repeatedly articulated concerns about being interchanged between the palliative care ward and the intended inpatient hospice while they had explicitly chosen to work in palliative medicine.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The overall high level of anticipated progress and excitement is very encouraging. Albeit serious concerns were mentioned, our results indicate that all participants believe in a positive impact and highlight the need of developing a solid concept. In order to implement such a hospice within a university setting, it is important to consider multilevel contextual factors such as system-level factors (funding, external and internal regulations), organization-level factors (leadership, staff motivation), and patient-level factors (adaptability to patients' needs). Our findings illustrate the importance of understanding the context of practice before implementation. Our pre-implementation study helps identify critical views from staff members and volunteers that may hinder or advance the implementation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (#DRKS00021258) on April 17
Identifiants
pubmed: 37464336
doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01220-6
pii: 10.1186/s12904-023-01220-6
pmc: PMC10354892
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
96Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Jan;33(1):90-8
pubmed: 17196910
Cancer Nurs. 2007 Nov-Dec;30(6):488-97
pubmed: 18025922
Intern Med J. 2006 Jul;36(7):406-13
pubmed: 16780445
J Palliat Med. 2005 Oct;8(5):1042-54
pubmed: 16238518
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Apr;69:9-24
pubmed: 28119163
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 Apr;25(4):S3-5
pubmed: 12723543
Milbank Q. 2011 Sep;89(3):343-80
pubmed: 21933272
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2016 Sep;33(8):755-9
pubmed: 26275783
Geriatr Nurs. 2005 Jan-Feb;26(1):16-20, 64
pubmed: 15716810
Palliat Med. 2018 Apr;32(4):851-860
pubmed: 29235418
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):14-8
pubmed: 25951678
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Mar;21(3):197-203
pubmed: 11239738
J Palliat Med. 2001 Winter;4(4):441-9
pubmed: 11798474
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
pubmed: 16204405
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2004 May;16(3):223-4
pubmed: 15191012