Developing an Inclusive Scholarship Curriculum for Medical Students.
Journal
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
ISSN: 1938-808X
Titre abrégé: Acad Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904605
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 12 2023
01 12 2023
Historique:
medline:
1
12
2023
pubmed:
21
7
2023
entrez:
21
7
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As part of a curriculum renewal, in 2020, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis sought to create an integrated curriculum that allows students to explore 4 academic career pathways (advocacy/global health, education, innovation, and research) and engage in scholarship activities-the Inquiry Curriculum. The curriculum needed to focus on foundational scholarship skills that would be applicable to all pathways. This article describes the process used to develop the curriculum learning objectives and lessons learned from initial implementation. The authors used a modified Delphi process to survey faculty experts from the 4 pathways to determine the objectives (March-May 2020). Twenty-four faculty were surveyed about 48 initial objectives created using Glassick's scholarship criteria. After 2 rounds, 28 objectives met consensus. Further oversight committee review and revisions by session leads resulted in 77 unique objectives for 23 sessions in the curriculum that launched in spring 2021. Four themes were identified from student feedback: (1) the Inquiry Curriculum framework creates opportunities for students to gain exposure to various approaches to understanding and addressing health care problems, (2) the curriculum targeted higher-level objectives for traditional research content and lower-level objectives for nontraditional content, (3) Glassick's criteria provided a useful structure for students to understand the rationale for and ordering of content, and (4) the curriculum had natural overlap with content often taught elsewhere in the curriculum, including evidence-based medicine, health equity, public and population health, and quality improvement and patient safety. The authors plan to consolidate sessions where there is redundancy, expand other sessions that require more time, and more purposefully discuss prior content when redundancy is intentional. Exploring other potential measures of curricular success, such as student learning outcomes, scholarly productivity, and impact on future scholarship engagement and career paths, is part of ongoing work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37478149
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005333
pii: 00001888-202312000-00020
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1396-1401Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Références
Colson ER, Nuñez S, De Fer TM, et al. Washington University School of Medicine. Acad Med. 2020;95(9 suppl):S285–S290.
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. Mission & Vision Statements. https://medicine.wustl.edu/about/mission . Accessed June 22, 2023.
Burk-Rafel J, Mullan PB, Wagenschutz H, et al. Scholarly concentration program development: A generalizable, data-driven approach. Acad Med. 2016;91(11 suppl):S16–S23.
Chang Y, Ramnanan CJ. A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research: Experiences, attitudes, and outcomes. Acad Med. 2015;90:1162–1173.
Ha TC, Ng S, Chen C, et al. Inclination towards research and the pursuit of a research career among medical students: An international cohort study. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:86.
Martin JB. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of Deans: Educating Doctors to Provide High Quality Medical Care: A Vision for Medical Education in the United States. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 2004.
Glassick CE. Boyer’s expanded definitions of scholarship, the standards for assessing scholarship, and the elusiveness of the scholarship of teaching. Acad Med. 2000;75:877–880.
Humphrey-Murto S, Varpio L, Gonsalves C, et al. Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and nominal group in medical education research. Med Teach. 2017;39:14–19.
Voogt JM, Pieters JM, Handelzalts A. Teacher collaboration in curriculum design teams: Effects, mechanisms, and conditions. Educ Res Eval. 2016;22:121–140.
Harden R, Stamper N. What is a spiral curriculum? Med Teach. 1999;21:141–143.