The UK BiLEVE and Mendelian randomisation: using multivariable instrumental variables to address "damned if you, damned if you don't" adjustment problems.
Journal
BMC research notes
ISSN: 1756-0500
Titre abrégé: BMC Res Notes
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jul 2023
25 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
20
01
2023
accepted:
17
07
2023
medline:
27
7
2023
pubmed:
26
7
2023
entrez:
25
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To explore the use of multivariable instrumental variables to resolve the "damned if you do, damned if you don't" adjustment problem created for Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis using the smoking or lung function related phenotypes in the UK Biobank (UKB). "damned if you do, damned if you don't" adjustment problems occur when both adjusting and not-adjusting for a variable will induce bias in an analysis. One instance of this occurs because the genotyping chip of UKB participants differed based on lung function/smoking status. In simulations, we show that multivariable instrumental variables analyses can attenuate potential collider bias introduced by adjusting for a proposed covariate, such as the UKB genotyping chip. We then explore the effect of adjusting for genotyping chip in a multivariable MR model exploring the effect of smoking on seven medical outcomes (lung cancer, emphysema, hypertension, stroke, heart diseases, depression, and disabilities). We additionally compare our results to a traditional univariate MR analysis using genome-wide analyses summary statistics which had and had not adjusted for genotyping chip. This analysis implies that the difference in genotyping chip has introduced only a small amount of bias.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37491359
doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06434-8
pii: 10.1186/s13104-023-06434-8
pmc: PMC10369748
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
157Subventions
Organisme : Economic and Social Research Council
ID : ES/P000630/1
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Oct;3(10):769-81
pubmed: 26423011
BMJ. 2018 Jul 12;362:k601
pubmed: 30002074
Elife. 2018 May 30;7:
pubmed: 29846171
BMC Public Health. 2009 Sep 22;9:356
pubmed: 19772635
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1121-1130
pubmed: 26343387
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Mar;22(3):343-352
pubmed: 30718901
Prev Med. 2007 Jul;45(1):3-8
pubmed: 17482249
Br Med J. 1956 Nov 10;2(5001):1071-81
pubmed: 13364389
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):1943-1956
pubmed: 35383846
Stat Med. 2019 May 20;38(11):2074-2102
pubmed: 30652356
Ann Intern Med. 1956 Aug;45(2):268-74
pubmed: 13355150
Nat Genet. 2018 Apr;50(4):524-537
pubmed: 29531354
Blood Press. 2005;14(2):69-71
pubmed: 16036482
Psychol Med. 2020 Oct;50(14):2435-2443
pubmed: 31689377
Am J Epidemiol. 2015 Feb 15;181(4):251-60
pubmed: 25632051
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2010 Jul;8(7):917-32
pubmed: 20602553
Stat Med. 2021 Nov 10;40(25):5434-5452
pubmed: 34338327
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1734-1739
pubmed: 28398548
Front Genet. 2021 Jan 15;11:610852
pubmed: 33519914
Nat Genet. 2014 Jul;46(7):736-41
pubmed: 24880342