Fish Consumption during Pregnancy in Relation to National Guidance in England in a Mixed-Methods Study: The PEAR Study.
PEAR study
diet
fish
guidance
mercury
mixed methods
nutrition
pregnancy
Journal
Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jul 2023
20 Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
12
06
2023
revised:
10
07
2023
accepted:
14
07
2023
medline:
31
7
2023
pubmed:
29
7
2023
entrez:
29
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Guidance on foods to limit or avoid in pregnancy is provided on the NHS website for England. Advice on fish consumption is related to exposure to mercury, dioxins and polychlorinated biphenyls, which may have adverse effects on fetal neurodevelopment. Our aim was to provide evidence on the effectiveness of the guidance in minimising exposure to toxins while maximising nutrient intake in a mixed-methods study. An online questionnaire on fish consumption before/during pregnancy was completed by postpartum women (≤12 months) in England (n = 598). A subsample of participants was invited to take part in an interview (n = 14). Women who ate fish before pregnancy reduced their intakes of both oily and white fish during pregnancy, with some avoiding it altogether. Women did not exceed the limit on tinned tuna, but there was evidence of mis-recall on the suggested limit. Overall intakes of fish were below that recommended during pregnancy (36% compliance for pre-pregnancy consumers). Barriers to fish consumption included risk aversion, confusion over specific details of the guidance, cost, availability, family preferences and smell/taste. Clarity and simplicity of the NHS guidance, with an overall message on the number of portions of fish a week advised prominently shown, would help pregnant women to benefit from the nutrients in fish while minimising exposure to toxins. The guidance on the number of cans of tuna advised per week is poorly recalled and needs to be disseminated accurately. The guidance on shark/marlin/swordfish could receive less prominence as it is rarely eaten by pregnant women in England.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37513635
pii: nu15143217
doi: 10.3390/nu15143217
pmc: PMC10384333
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mercury
FXS1BY2PGL
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T010010/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Dec;18(10):2465-78
pubmed: 24748213
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 8;23(1):152
pubmed: 36890490
Food Nutr Res. 2014 Jun 11;58:
pubmed: 24959115
Nutr Rev. 2015 Jan;73(1):4-11
pubmed: 26024053
Br J Nutr. 2021 Jul 14;126(1):66-80
pubmed: 32967738
Nutrients. 2015 Mar 18;7(3):2001-14
pubmed: 25793632
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Aug;29(4):418-26
pubmed: 26693662
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;23(5):446-53
pubmed: 19689495
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Nov;33(8):814-6
pubmed: 24219720
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 16;11(3):
pubmed: 30884831
Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2019 Dec;151:14-36
pubmed: 31739098
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Oct;58(10):1106-12
pubmed: 23064922
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1234-40
pubmed: 20844071
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jun;57(3):315-322
pubmed: 27624518
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016 Aug;219(6):513-20
pubmed: 27252152
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(11):2149-2159
pubmed: 29576029
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Jun;58(6):486-92
pubmed: 15143117
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):346-51
pubmed: 12907111