Radiographic reference values of the central knee anatomy in 8-16-year-old children.
Journal
Acta orthopaedica
ISSN: 1745-3682
Titre abrégé: Acta Orthop
Pays: Sweden
ID NLM: 101231512
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 07 2023
31 07 2023
Historique:
received:
01
04
2023
medline:
2
8
2023
pubmed:
31
7
2023
entrez:
31
7
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For correction of leg-length discrepancy or angular deformity of the lower limb in skeletally immature patients temporary or permanent (hemi-)epiphysiodesis can be employed. These are reliable treatments with few complications. Recently, radiographic analysis of treatment-related alterations of the central knee anatomy gained interest among pediatric orthopedic surgeons. To date the comparison and adequate interpretation of potential changes of the central knee anatomy is limited due to the lack of defined standardized radiographic references. We aimed to establish new reference values of the central knee anatomy. A retrospective analysis of calibrated longstanding anteroposterior radiographs of 254 skeletally immature patients with a chronological age ranging from 8 to 16 years was conducted. The following radiographic parameters were assessed: (1) femoral floor angle, (2) tibial roof angle, (3) width at femoral physis, and (4) femoral notch-intercondylar distance. All observed radiographic parameters were normally distributed with a mean age of 12.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.2-12.6). Mean femoral floor angle was 142° (SD 6, CI 141.8-142.9), mean tibial roof angle was 144° (SD 5, CI 143.7-144.1), mean width at femoral physis was 73 mm (SD 6, CI 72.8-73.9), and mean femoral notch-intercondylar distance was 8 mm (SD 1, CI 7.5-7.7). The estimated intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for all measurements. This study provides new radiographic reference values of the central knee anatomy for children between 8 and 16 years and we suggest considering values within the range of 2 SD as the physiological range.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
For correction of leg-length discrepancy or angular deformity of the lower limb in skeletally immature patients temporary or permanent (hemi-)epiphysiodesis can be employed. These are reliable treatments with few complications. Recently, radiographic analysis of treatment-related alterations of the central knee anatomy gained interest among pediatric orthopedic surgeons. To date the comparison and adequate interpretation of potential changes of the central knee anatomy is limited due to the lack of defined standardized radiographic references. We aimed to establish new reference values of the central knee anatomy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A retrospective analysis of calibrated longstanding anteroposterior radiographs of 254 skeletally immature patients with a chronological age ranging from 8 to 16 years was conducted. The following radiographic parameters were assessed: (1) femoral floor angle, (2) tibial roof angle, (3) width at femoral physis, and (4) femoral notch-intercondylar distance.
RESULTS
All observed radiographic parameters were normally distributed with a mean age of 12.4 years (standard deviation [SD] 2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.2-12.6). Mean femoral floor angle was 142° (SD 6, CI 141.8-142.9), mean tibial roof angle was 144° (SD 5, CI 143.7-144.1), mean width at femoral physis was 73 mm (SD 6, CI 72.8-73.9), and mean femoral notch-intercondylar distance was 8 mm (SD 1, CI 7.5-7.7). The estimated intraclass correlation coefficient values were excellent for all measurements.
CONCLUSION
This study provides new radiographic reference values of the central knee anatomy for children between 8 and 16 years and we suggest considering values within the range of 2 SD as the physiological range.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37522246
doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.15336
pmc: PMC10388364
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
393-398Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Mar;28(2):177-83
pubmed: 18388712
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2023 Feb 1;35(1):110-117
pubmed: 36218192
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2150-5
pubmed: 17908890
Acta Orthop. 2020 Oct;91(5):611-616
pubmed: 32452290
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Jun;69(5):745-9
pubmed: 3597474
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 17;10(6):
pubmed: 33802874
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Jun;(255):81-5
pubmed: 2347169
Orthopedics. 2013 May;36(5):e575-80
pubmed: 23672908
Bone Joint J. 2021 Aug;103-B(8):1428-1437
pubmed: 34334047
Bone Joint J. 2023 Mar 01;105-B(3):331-340
pubmed: 36854319
Orthopade. 2021 Jul;50(7):538-547
pubmed: 34170353
Clin Anat. 2022 Apr;35(3):305-315
pubmed: 34881441
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2430-9
pubmed: 19797579
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Nov;28(11):3625-3630
pubmed: 32236676
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Jan;30(1):78-83
pubmed: 33688977
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1106-1111
pubmed: 30062944
J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Apr-May;27(3):253-9
pubmed: 17414005
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949 Jul;31A(3):464-78
pubmed: 18153890
Eur J Pediatr. 2001 Nov;160(11):668-74
pubmed: 11760024
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2022 Jan-Apr;17(1):26-31
pubmed: 35734037
J Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Sep 17;23(1):46
pubmed: 36114882
Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1412-1418
pubmed: 32993328
Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2022 Jan-Apr;17(1):19-25
pubmed: 35734032
Bone Joint J. 2018 Aug;100-B(8):1112-1116
pubmed: 30062943
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2011 Feb;23(1):53-9
pubmed: 21169837
J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 May-Jun;18(3):363-9
pubmed: 9600565
Orthopade. 2014 Mar;43(3):267-84
pubmed: 24627039
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):747-754
pubmed: 32563432