'Walking epidural': comparison of the analgesic efficacy of levobupivacaine 0.0625% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL versus ropivacaine 0.075% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL.
Fentanyl
Labor
Levobupivacaine
Ropivacaine
Walking epidural
Journal
BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2023
01 08 2023
Historique:
received:
15
05
2023
accepted:
27
07
2023
medline:
3
8
2023
pubmed:
2
8
2023
entrez:
1
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Epidural infusion with low local anesthetic concentrations with opiates decrease the severity of the motor blockade associated. The present study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and the motor blockade between two local anesthetic epidural infusions: levobupivacaine 0.0625% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL versus ropivacaine 0.075% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL. In a single-blind prospective randomized study, 60 laboring parturient had continuous epidural analgesia as follows: 30 of them received levobupivacaine 0.0625% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL and 30 of them received ropivacaine 0.075% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL and rates of infusion were adjusted to the height. Analgesic, motor blockade and satisfaction records were collected as well as maternal and neonate adverse events. After 2 h of the catheter placement, patients who received levobupivacaine showed a mean VAS of 3.2 [1.8-4.6] versus 1.8 [1.2-2.5] (p = 0.05) in patients who received ropivacaine. In addition, patients who received levobupivacaine showed a punctuation in Bromage scale of 0.0 [0.0-1.0] versus 0.0 [0.0-0.0] (p = 0.04) in patients who received ropivacaine. Finally, the parturient who received levobupivacaine scored a mean satisfaction index of 8.1 [7.3-8.9] versus 9.3 [8.7-9.8] (p = 0.02) in those who received ropivacaine. We did not register maternal nor neonate adverse events. Both infusions (levobupivacaine 0.0625% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL and ropivacaine 0.075% + fentanyl 2mcg/mL) are effective for labor analgesia. However, ropivacaine would present a better pharmacodynamic profile with less motor blockade and decreased need for analgesic rescue hence improving patient's satisfaction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37528373
doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02222-w
pii: 10.1186/s12871-023-02222-w
pmc: PMC10392001
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ropivacaine
7IO5LYA57N
Levobupivacaine
A5H73K9U3W
Anesthetics, Local
0
Fentanyl
UF599785JZ
Bupivacaine
Y8335394RO
Amides
0
Analgesics
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
259Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Anesthesiology. 2003 Dec;99(6):1354-8
pubmed: 14639148
Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Apr 17;11(2):e113350
pubmed: 34336624
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2000 Oct;47(8):332-6
pubmed: 11103113
N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 22;362(16):1503-10
pubmed: 20410515
Anesth Analg. 1989 Jun;68(6):724-7
pubmed: 2735537
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2019 Oct;66(8):417-424
pubmed: 31138442
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002 Jan-Feb;27(1):31-6
pubmed: 11799502
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Aug;67:100-112
pubmed: 32265134
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Jun;24(3):268-73
pubmed: 21508836
Am Fam Physician. 1998 Nov 15;58(8):1785-92
pubmed: 9835854
Br J Anaesth. 1983 Feb;55(2):163-7
pubmed: 6830678
Arch Esp Urol. 2007 Oct;60(8):973-8
pubmed: 18050762
Can J Anaesth. 1991 Apr;38(3):303-10
pubmed: 2036692
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):2307-2313
pubmed: 31410181
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2003 Feb;50(2):70-6
pubmed: 12712868