An empirical comparison of several commercial enzyme immunoassays for the non-invasive assessment of adrenocortical and gonadal function in mountain gorillas.

Androgen Assay validation Glucocorticoid Immunoassay Primate Wildlife

Journal

General and comparative endocrinology
ISSN: 1095-6840
Titre abrégé: Gen Comp Endocrinol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 10 2023
Historique:
received: 20 02 2023
revised: 29 06 2023
accepted: 27 07 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 3 8 2023
entrez: 2 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Wildlife researchers seeking to non-invasively examine endocrine function in their study species are presented with a dense and technical 'garden of forking paths' to navigate between collecting a biological sample and obtaining a final measurement. In particular, the choice of which enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to use with collected fecal samples, out of the many options offered by different manufacturers and research laboratories, may be one of the most consequential for final results. However, guidance for making this decision is still emerging. With this gap in mind, we performed a head-to-head comparison of results obtained from four different EIAs for fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (FGCMs), and three different EIAs for fecal androgen metabolites (FAMs), applied to the same set of fecal samples collected from the mountain gorillas (Gorilla beringei beringei) monitored by the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund in Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. We provide a) an analytical validation of the different EIAs via tests of parallelism and linearity; b) an estimate of inter-assay correlation between EIA kits designed for the same metabolites; and c) a test of the kits' ecological validity, in which we examine how well each captures endocrine changes following events that theory predicts should result in elevated FGCM and/or FAM concentrations. Our results show that kits differ to some degree in their performance; at the same time, nearly all assays exhibited at least moderate evidence of validity and covariance with others for the same analyte. Our findings, which differ somewhat from similar comparisons performed in other species, demonstrate the need to directly assess assay performance in a species- and context-specific manner as part of efforts to develop the burgeoning discipline of wildlife endocrinology.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37532156
pii: S0016-6480(23)00156-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2023.114351
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Glucocorticoids 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114351

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Nicholas M Grebe (NM)

Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, United States. Electronic address: ngrebe@umich.edu.

Winnie Eckardt (W)

Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Musanze, Rwanda.

Tara S Stoinski (TS)

Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Atlanta GA, United States.

Rose Umuhoza (R)

Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund, Musanze, Rwanda.

Rachel M Santymire (RM)

Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA, United States.

Stacy Rosenbaum (S)

Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI, United States.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH