Motivation towards first trimester screening for preeclampsia among pregnant women in Denmark: A cross-sectional questionnaire study.
Theory of Planned Behavior
first trimester screening
motivation
preeclampsiaquestionnaire
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
revised:
16
05
2023
received:
16
02
2023
accepted:
20
06
2023
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
3
8
2023
entrez:
3
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this cross-sectional questionnaire study was to investigate motivation to participate in a possible new screening for preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy among Danish pregnant women through a questionnaire based on Theory of Planned Behavior developed for this specific purpose. The new screening combines maternal characteristics with mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index and biochemical markers to predict the risk of preeclampsia, whereas the current Danish screening uses maternal characteristics alone. Participation was offered to a proportion of women attending a first or a second trimester screening scan at two University Hospitals in Copenhagen. The questionnaire was set up in REDCap® and answers were entered directly into the database, which was accessed via a QR-code. We invited 772 pregnant women to participate in the questionnaire survey between November 2021 and April 2022 at Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet (study site one) (n = 238) and Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre (study site two) (n = 534). The response rate was 71.8% (171/238) at study site one and 33.9% (181/534) at study site two. A total of 352 women were included in the study (total participation rate 45.6%). Most women had a positive attitude towards preeclampsia screening in pregnancy, and 99.4% said they would participate in a risk assessment for preeclampsia if given the opportunity. A total of 97.4% answered "yes" to whether a first trimester preeclampsia screening should be offered to all pregnant women in Denmark. Positive motivation to participate in preeclampsia screening was correlated with having a network with a positive attitude towards preeclampsia screening. The results of this study indicate that Danish pregnant women have a positive attitude towards participation in a first trimester screening for preeclampsia. This observation might be useful in relation to possible future implementation in Denmark.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37533170
doi: 10.1111/aogs.14632
pmc: PMC10577627
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1531-1540Subventions
Organisme : The Research Fund of Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Aug;96(8):991-997
pubmed: 28401538
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):756-760
pubmed: 28295782
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Nov;102(11):1531-1540
pubmed: 37533170
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622
pubmed: 28657417
BMC Psychol. 2022 Jun 9;10(1):146
pubmed: 35681211
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 7;17(1):12
pubmed: 28061818
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):346-52
pubmed: 15737971
Dan Med J. 2016 Apr;63(4):
pubmed: 27034184
AJOG Glob Rep. 2023 Apr 05;3(2):100205
pubmed: 37168545
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 5;15(11):e0238472
pubmed: 33151928
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Apr;10(4):4547-4554
pubmed: 33832312
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Mar 5;169(10):914-8
pubmed: 17359736
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 6;10(8):e037619
pubmed: 32764087
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 May;97(5):577-586
pubmed: 29350746
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):999-1011
pubmed: 26342729
J Am Coll Health. 2017 Apr;65(3):197-207
pubmed: 27960609
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 26;20(1):1290
pubmed: 32847501
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):62.e1-62.e10
pubmed: 25724400
Prenat Diagn. 2013 Feb;33(2):146-52
pubmed: 23225252
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):804
pubmed: 33902501
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):743-750
pubmed: 29536574
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2021 Aug 17;21(1):211
pubmed: 34404404
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32(3):171-8
pubmed: 22846473
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2S):S1071-S1097.e2
pubmed: 32682859
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):650.e1-650.e16
pubmed: 31589866
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2013;33(1):8-15
pubmed: 22906914