Feeding dietary fermentable fiber improved fecal microbial composition and increased acetic acid production in a nursery pig model.


Journal

Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jan 2023
Historique:
received: 14 05 2023
accepted: 02 08 2023
pmc-release: 03 08 2024
medline: 31 8 2023
pubmed: 3 8 2023
entrez: 3 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The objective of this study was to determine the fermentable fiber (FF) content of several common fibrous ingredients fed to nursery pigs, and then evaluate the effect of dietary FF level on growth performance and fecal microbial composition. In experiment 1, 54 nursery pigs were randomly allotted to be fed nine diets with six replicate pigs per diet. Dietary treatments included a corn-soybean meal basal diet and eight test diets based on a mixture of the corn-soybean meal diet and corn distillers dried grains with solubles, sunflower meal, oat bran, wheat bran, corn bran, sugar beet pulp (SBP), apple pomace (AP) or soybean hulls (SH). In experiment 2, 180 nursery pigs were housed in 30 pens (six pigs per pen) and randomly allotted to be fed five diets with different FF to total dietary fiber (TDF) ratios, which were 0.52, 0.55, 0.58, 0.61, and 0.64, respectively. Results showed that the FF content in SBP, AP, and SH was greater (P < 0.01) than that in other ingredients. Water binding capacity of fibrous ingredients was positively correlated (P < 0.05) to the digestibility of TDF, acid detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in test ingredients. Pigs fed the SBP, AP and SH diets had greater (P < 0.05) fecal acetic acid and total short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) concentrations compared with pigs fed other diets. Fecal acetic acid and total SCFAs concentrations were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with FF content in experimental diets. Average daily weight gain and average daily feed intake of pigs quadratically increased (P < 0.01) as the ratios of FF to TDF increased. Pigs in FF64% group showed higher (P < 0.05) ACE index and fecal acetic acid concentration compared with pigs fed the dietary FF/TDF ratio of 0.52 to 0.61. Compared with the classification system of soluble dietary fiber and insoluble dietary fiber, FF could better describe the mechanism by which dietary fiber has beneficial effects on pig gut health. In nursery pigs, dietary fiber has received increasing attention because of its beneficial effects on the development and functional aspects of the gut. The most common physicochemical classification of dietary fiber is to divide it into two categories based on its solubility in water, as an indicator of its potential function and physiological effects in the gastrointestinal tract. Generally, soluble fiber, as the primary source of microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids, is considered a useful predictor of the degree of microbial fermentation in the gut. Although fiber solubility may provide the first valuable information regarding physiological considerations of fermentability, it is not applicable to all fibrous ingredients, such as soluble carboxymethylcellulose, which is difficult to ferment. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the fermentable fiber (FF) content of several common fibrous ingredients fed to nursery pigs, and then evaluate the effect of dietary FF level on growth performance and fecal microbial composition of nursery pigs.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
In nursery pigs, dietary fiber has received increasing attention because of its beneficial effects on the development and functional aspects of the gut. The most common physicochemical classification of dietary fiber is to divide it into two categories based on its solubility in water, as an indicator of its potential function and physiological effects in the gastrointestinal tract. Generally, soluble fiber, as the primary source of microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids, is considered a useful predictor of the degree of microbial fermentation in the gut. Although fiber solubility may provide the first valuable information regarding physiological considerations of fermentability, it is not applicable to all fibrous ingredients, such as soluble carboxymethylcellulose, which is difficult to ferment. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the fermentable fiber (FF) content of several common fibrous ingredients fed to nursery pigs, and then evaluate the effect of dietary FF level on growth performance and fecal microbial composition of nursery pigs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37535451
pii: 7236512
doi: 10.1093/jas/skad260
pmc: PMC10464512
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Acetic Acid Q40Q9N063P
Dietary Fiber 0
Fatty Acids, Volatile 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Front Microbiol. 2019 Feb 05;10:90
pubmed: 30804899
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Apr 20;12(1):54
pubmed: 33879267
Animals (Basel). 2020 Feb 07;10(2):
pubmed: 32045993
J Sci Food Agric. 2020 Aug 30;100(11):4282-4291
pubmed: 32378205
J Anim Sci. 2010 Sep;88(9):2959-67
pubmed: 20453088
J Anim Sci. 2010 Apr;88(4):1454-62
pubmed: 20023135
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Feb;18(2):101-116
pubmed: 33208922
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:279-96
pubmed: 25002092
Br J Nutr. 2013 Nov;110(10):1837-48
pubmed: 23656640
J Anim Sci. 2006 Dec;84(12):3337-45
pubmed: 17093226
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 29;11(2):
pubmed: 33572852
Animal. 2012 Apr;6(4):603-11
pubmed: 22436276
Cell. 2016 Jun 2;165(6):1332-1345
pubmed: 27259147
Anim Sci J. 2019 Aug;90(8):939-947
pubmed: 31144412
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;12(16):
pubmed: 36009643
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90 Suppl 4:318-20
pubmed: 23365366
J Anim Sci. 2018 Mar 6;96(2):532-544
pubmed: 29385488
J Anim Sci. 2018 Jun 4;96(6):2265-2277
pubmed: 29688508
Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):248-262
pubmed: 30007918
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2017 Feb;68(1):65-72
pubmed: 27484261
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2014 Mar 01;5(1):15
pubmed: 24580966
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015 Nov 20;5:84
pubmed: 26636046
J Sci Food Agric. 2019 Jun;99(8):3895-3902
pubmed: 30684273
J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;52(1):1-8
pubmed: 27448578
J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;95(2):727-739
pubmed: 28380581
J Anim Sci. 2012 Apr;90(4):1242-54
pubmed: 22147488
ACS Omega. 2019 Sep 04;4(12):15158-15167
pubmed: 31552361
Br J Nutr. 2012 Jul 14;108(1):9-15
pubmed: 22018207
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Mar 04;6:48
pubmed: 30886850
BMC Biol. 2019 Oct 28;17(1):83
pubmed: 31660948
Cell Rep. 2019 Jan 2;26(1):222-235.e5
pubmed: 30605678
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2012 Nov;62(Pt 11):2613-2617
pubmed: 22199215
J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Aug 1;66(30):7995-8004
pubmed: 29986139
Animals (Basel). 2019 Jul 05;9(7):
pubmed: 31284518
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 23;2019:7809171
pubmed: 31950054
J Anim Sci. 2008 Oct;86(10):2568-75
pubmed: 18539846
Benef Microbes. 2019 Mar 13;10(2):121-135
pubmed: 30525950
J Anim Sci. 2018 Dec 3;96(12):5233-5243
pubmed: 30299467
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 04;11(2):
pubmed: 33557345
J Nutr. 2016 Jul;146(7):1298-306
pubmed: 27281813

Auteurs

Gang Zhang (G)

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Swine Nutrition laboratory, Wellhope Foods Co., Ltd., Shengyang 110164, China.

Jinbiao Zhao (J)

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Xiaoming Song (X)

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Meiyu Yang (M)

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Haotian Wang (H)

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Yi Wu (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ministry of Agriculture Feed Industry Centre, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH