Reparations for people living with dementia: Recognition, accountability, change, now!

abuse human rights justice law long term care neglect redress reparations residential aged care violence

Journal

Dementia (London, England)
ISSN: 1741-2684
Titre abrégé: Dementia (London)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101128698

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 15 11 2023
pubmed: 6 8 2023
entrez: 5 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is a significant and longstanding problem of harm to people living with dementia in long term care institutions ('LTC institutions', referred to by others as 'care homes', 'nursing homes', 'long term care', 'residential aged care facilities'), along with a failure to redress the harm or hold people accountable for this harm. This article reports on an Australian project that found reparations must be a response to harm to people living with dementia in residential aged care. Using a disability human rights methodology, focus groups were conducted with people living with dementia, care partners and family members, advocates and lawyers to explore perspectives on why and how to redress harm to people living with dementia in Australian LTC institutions. Researchers found four key themes provide the basis for the necessity and design of a reparative approach to redress - recognition, accountability, change, now. The article calls for further attention to reparations in dementia scholarship, with a particular focus on the role that can be played in the delivery of reparations by the LTC industry, dementia practitioners, and dementia scholars. Ultimately, this article provides a new understanding of responses to violence, abuse, neglect and other harms experienced by people living with dementia in LTC institutions, which centres justice, rights, and transformative change.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37542425
doi: 10.1177/14713012231190832
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1738-1756

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Linda Steele (L)

Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.

Kate Swaffer (K)

School of Justice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Hope Siciliano (H)

Faculty of Law, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, NSW, Australia.

Evelyn Rose (E)

School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

William John Mitchell (WJ)

College of Business, Law and Governance, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, Australia.

Karen Kobier (K)

People with Disability Australia, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Brenda Bailey (B)

Independent Researcher, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH