Classification and clinical significance of the posterior group of renal calyces.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Aug 2023
04 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
7
8
2023
pubmed:
6
8
2023
entrez:
6
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To study the anatomical orientation of the posterior group of calyces based on reconstructed images of computerized tomography urography (CTU) and provide a novel classification with its clinical significance. Clinical data of a total of 1321 patients, who underwent CTU examination in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among these, a total of 2642 3-dimensional reconstructed images of CTU scans were considered in this study. Based on the morphology of the renal calyces and the influence on the establishment of surgical access, the posterior group renal calyces are classified into 3 major types including pot-belly type, classically branched and elongated branched. The classically branched type is further classified into 3 sub-types: a, b and c, based on the association of minor calyces of the posterior group to the major calyces. Type a is derived from 1 group of major calyces only, type b is derived from 2 groups of major calyces simultaneously, and type c is derived from 3 groups of major calyces simultaneously. Statistical findings revealed that all kidneys possess posterior group calyces. The percentage of occurrence of pot-belly type, classically branched and elongated branched is 8.06%, 73.13%, and 18.81%, respectively. The anatomical typing of the classical branching type occurred in 19.36%, 68.17%, and 12.47% for types a, b, and c, respectively. In this study, the posterior group calyces were found to be present across all patients. The posterior group calyces were highest in the classical branching type, of which anatomical typing was highest in type b. The typing of the posterior group of calyces could provide an anatomical basis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) puncture from the posterior group.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37543815
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034443
pii: 00005792-202308040-00058
pmc: PMC10402955
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e34443Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
BJU Int. 2008 Mar;101(5):535-9
pubmed: 17922862
J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1137-42
pubmed: 10992353
Int Urol Nephrol. 2011 Dec;43(4):983-7
pubmed: 21394440
J Urol. 1992 Feb;147(2):322-4
pubmed: 1732584
Asian J Urol. 2019 Jul;6(3):249-255
pubmed: 31297316
J Endourol. 2014 Mar;28(3):360-3
pubmed: 24148004
Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):146-58
pubmed: 21978422
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):733-7
pubmed: 21676442
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:38-45
pubmed: 30445123
Curr Opin Urol. 2001 Jul;11(4):359-66
pubmed: 11429494
Urolithiasis. 2021 Dec;49(6):559-566
pubmed: 33811497
Radiographics. 2001 Mar-Apr;21(2):373-86; questionnaire 549-55
pubmed: 11259702
Adv Urol. 2022 Jul 18;2022:1716554
pubmed: 35898579
Urology. 2017 Sep;107:43-48
pubmed: 28629676
J Urol. 1990 Apr;143(4):679-81
pubmed: 2313791
Br J Urol. 1972 Apr;44(2):246-61
pubmed: 5041555
J Endourol. 2020 May;34(5):550-557
pubmed: 32008375
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):475-82
pubmed: 26344917
Springerplus. 2016 Aug 17;5(1):1356
pubmed: 27588249
J Endourol. 2018 Aug;32(8):753-758
pubmed: 29845879
Eur Radiol. 2009 May;19(5):1280-8
pubmed: 19142644