The efficacy, safety, and adverse events of azapirones in anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Anxiety
Azapirones
Meta-analysis
Systematic review
Journal
European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology
ISSN: 1873-7862
Titre abrégé: Eur Neuropsychopharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9111390
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2023
11 2023
Historique:
received:
25
04
2023
revised:
08
07
2023
accepted:
13
07
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
7
8
2023
entrez:
6
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Azapirones have been proposed as anxiety and mood modulators. We assessed azapirones' viability in anxiety disorders via systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis, inquiring PubMed/MEDLINE/CENTRAL/WHO-ICTRP/WebOfScience/VIP up-to 05/01/2023. We conducted sensitivity, and subgroup analyses assessing heterogeneity, publication bias, risk of bias, and confidence in the evidence within the GRADE framework. Symptom reduction (mean difference/MD), study-defined response (risk ratios/RRs), and acceptability were co-primary outcomes. Adverse events and withdrawal were secondary. Seventy studies were included. In generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), azapirones largely outperformed placebo (MD=-4.91, 95%C.I.[-5.91, -3.90], Hedges'g -1.37 [-1.02, -0.73]), k = 22, n = 2,567; RR=1.64, 95%C.I.[1.45, 1.86], k = 9, n = 1,346). While azapirones overlapped benzodiazepines in symptom reduction (MD=-0.12, 95%C.I.[-0.70, 0.45], k = 34, n = 3,160), they were slightly outperformed in response rate (RR=0.94, 95%C.I.[0.90, 0.99], k = 18, n = 2,423). Azapirones overlapped SRIs (MD=0.09, 95%C.I.[-0.49, 0.67], k = 8, n = 747; RR=0.97, 95%C.I.[0.89, 1.07], k = 7, n = 737). Confidence in estimates was high/moderate vs. placebo, moderate/low vs. benzodiazepine, very-low vs. SRIs. Azapirones failed to outperform the placebo in panic and social anxiety disorders. Azapirones overlapped placebo and SRIs in drop-out rates, while they showed higher treatment discontinuation rates than benzodiazepines (RR=1.33, 95%C.I.[1.16, 1.53], k = 23, n = 2,768). Azapirones caused less sedation/fatigue/drowsiness/weakness/cognitive issues than benzodiazepines, resembling placebo. They caused more nausea and dizziness than placebo, more headache and nausea than benzodiazepines, and less nausea and xerostomia than SRIs. Azapirones proved effective and relatively well-tolerated for GAD. They should be preferred over benzodiazepines, especially in the long-term, considering their lower sedation and addiction potential, representing a potential SRI alternative. Further research is warranted to prove efficacy in panic and social anxiety.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37544075
pii: S0924-977X(23)00139-6
doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.07.008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzodiazepines
12794-10-4
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
23-51Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. and ECNP. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest TK has received speaker's honoraria from Sumitomo, Eisai, Janssen, Otsuka, Meiji, MSD, Viatris, and Takeda and research grants from Eisai, the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (21GC1018), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (19K08082), and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP22dk0307107 and JP22wm0525024). MS has received honoraria/has been a consultant for Angelini, Lundbeck, and Otsuka. MF served as a rater for Massachusetts General Hospital Clinical Trials Network and Institute, Boston, MA, USA, and its subsidiaries for the following entities. MF also received honoraria from the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology (ASCP) for his speaker activities, and from Angelini, Lundbeck, Bristol Meyer Squibb, and Boehringer-Ingelheim. AdB has received research support from Janssen, Lundbeck, and Otsuka and lecture fees for educational meeting from Chiesi, Lundbeck, Roche, Sunovion, Vitria, Recordati, Angelini and Takeda; he has served on advisory boards for Eli Lilly, Jansen, Lundbeck, Otsuka, Roche, and Takeda, Chiesi, Recordati, Angelini, Vitria. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.