Are we improving in the optimization of surgery for high-risk adult cervical spine deformity patients over time?


Journal

Journal of neurosurgery. Spine
ISSN: 1547-5646
Titre abrégé: J Neurosurg Spine
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101223545

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2023
Historique:
received: 30 04 2023
accepted: 24 05 2023
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 7 8 2023
entrez: 7 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to investigate whether surgery for high-risk patients is being optimized over time and if poor outcomes are being minimized. Patients who underwent surgery for cervical deformity (CD) and were ≥ 18 years with baseline and 2-year data were stratified by year of surgery from 2013 to 2018. The cohort was divided into two groups based on when the surgery was performed. Patients in the early cohort underwent surgery between 2013 and 2015 and those in the recent cohort underwent surgery between 2016 and 2018. High-risk patients met at least 2 of the following criteria: 1) baseline C2-7 Cobb angle > 15°, mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis ≥ 35°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°; 2) age ≥ 70 years; 3) severe baseline frailty (Miller index); 4) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 1 SD above the mean; 5) three-column osteotomy as treatment; and 6) fusion > 10 levels or > 7 levels for elderly patients. The mean comparison analysis assessed differences between groups. Stepwise multivariable linear regression described associations between increasing year of surgery and complications. Eighty-two CD patients met high-risk criteria (mean age 62.11 ± 10.87 years, 63.7% female, mean BMI 29.70 ± 8.16 kg/m2, and mean CCI 1.07 ± 1.45). The proportion of high-risk patients increased with time, with 41.8% of patients in the early cohort classified as high risk compared with 47.6% of patients in the recent cohort (p > 0.05). Recent high-risk patients were more likely to be female (p = 0.008), have a lower BMI (p = 0.038), and have a higher baseline CCI (p = 0.013). Surgically, high-risk patients in the recent cohort were more likely to undergo low-grade osteotomy (p = 0.003). By postoperative complications, recent high-risk patients were less likely to experience any postoperative adverse events overall (p = 0.020) or complications such as dysphagia (p = 0.045) at 2 years. Regression analysis revealed increasing year of surgery to be correlated with decreasing minor complication rates (p = 0.030), as well as lowered rates of distal junctional kyphosis by 2 years (p = 0.048). Over time, high-risk CD patients have an increase in frequency and comorbidity rates but have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes. These findings suggest that spine surgeons have improved over time in optimizing selection and reducing potential adverse events in high-risk patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37548546
doi: 10.3171/2023.5.SPINE23457
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

628-635

Auteurs

Peter G Passias (PG)

1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York.
2New York Spine Institute, New York, New York.

Peter S Tretiakov (PS)

1Departments of Orthopedic and Neurological Surgery, Division of Spine Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, New York.
2New York Spine Institute, New York, New York.

Justin S Smith (JS)

3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Renaud Lafage (R)

4Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.

Bassel Diebo (B)

5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Justin K Scheer (JK)

6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Robert K Eastlack (RK)

7Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California.

Alan H Daniels (AH)

5Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Eric O Klineberg (EO)

8Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Davis, California.

Khaled M Khabeish (KM)

9Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland.

Gregory M Mundis (GM)

7Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, California.

Jay D Turner (JD)

10Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona.

Munish C Gupta (MC)

11Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri.

Han Jo Kim (HJ)

12Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Frank Schwab (F)

4Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.

Shay Bess (S)

13Department of Spine Surgery, Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St. Luke's/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, Colorado; and.

Virginie Lafage (V)

4Department of Orthopaedics, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, New York, New York.

Christopher P Ames (CP)

6Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California.

Christopher I Shaffrey (CI)

14Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH