Integrated ESI-MS/MS and APCI-MS/MS based metabolomics reveal the effects of canning and storage on peach fruits.
Canning
Carotenoids
Peaches metabolites
Phytochemical loss
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
21
11
2022
revised:
27
07
2023
accepted:
31
07
2023
medline:
7
9
2023
pubmed:
8
8
2023
entrez:
7
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The characterization of peach metabolites and carotenoids during canning and storage remains unclear. The present study identified 658 metabolites and 40 carotenoids in peach fruits throughout the canning and storage using ESI-MS/MS and APCI-MS/MS based metabolome approach. A total of 282 differentially accumulated metabolites were found, mainly including 78 phenolic acids, 74 lipids, 61 flavonoids. Five esterified carotenoids (rubixanthin palmitate, β-cryptoxanthin oleate, β-cryptoxanthin laurate, β-cryptoxanthin palmitate, and β-cryptoxanthin myristate) were the main peach carotenoids, with a proportion of approximately 90%, while free carotenoids accounted for 4.22-5.95% during the entire processing period. Moreover, the total carotenoid loss rates for canning and storage were 56.67% and 46.55%, respectively. Compared to the loss of free carotenoids, esterified carotenoids were more stable during storage, while canning led to a greater loss of esterified carotenoids. The results provided new insights into the maintenance of health-related phytochemicals from canning processes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37549620
pii: S0308-8146(23)01705-3
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137087
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Beta-Cryptoxanthin
0
Carotenoids
36-88-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
137087Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.