Outcomes of neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid pre and post 2015 NRP guideline implementation.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 04 04 2023
accepted: 30 07 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
pubmed: 10 8 2023
entrez: 10 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A shift in the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines occurred in 2015 from routine intubation and endotracheal suctioning of all meconium-stained non-vigorous infants towards less aggressive interventions based on response to initial resuscitation. This study aims to examine the impact of this change on outcomes of non-vigorous infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid at a level III academic NICU encompassing years before and after the change in guideline. This single-center retrospective study compared NICU therapies and clinical outcomes of 117 non-vigorous newborns pre-guideline implementation to 106 non-vigorous newborns post-guideline implementation. Nearly two thirds of infants in the pre-guideline cohort received endotracheal suctioning with recovery of meconium compared to less than a third of infants in the post-guideline cohort (p<0.01). Though a higher proportion of the pre-guideline cohort were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues compared to the post-guideline cohort, the two groups did not differ significantly with regard to morbidity and therapies. Despite a marked reduction in rates of intubation and endotracheal suctioning, there is no difference in outcomes between pre-guideline implementation vs post-guideline implementation in non-vigorous meconium-stained infants, supporting the recent NRP guideline change and highlighting the benefit of expectant management.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37561740
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289945
pii: PONE-D-23-09079
pmc: PMC10414582
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0289945

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Saint-Fleur et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Pediatrics. 1993 Mar;91(3):617-23
pubmed: 8441569
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):171-83
pubmed: 1733193
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):974
pubmed: 28898380
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Aug;22(4):214-219
pubmed: 28411000
J Perinatol. 2021 Jan;41(1):6-16
pubmed: 32753712
Children (Basel). 2021 Mar 23;8(3):
pubmed: 33806734
Am J Perinatol. 2018 Jul;35(9):815-822
pubmed: 29341045
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Jan;106(1):31-38
pubmed: 32561566
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;185(4):931-8
pubmed: 11641681
Children (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;8(3):
pubmed: 33802887
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 13;19(1):279
pubmed: 31409303
Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84
pubmed: 27255954
Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Dec;178(12):1825-1832
pubmed: 31588974
J Perinatol. 2018 Feb;38(2):137-141
pubmed: 29095429
Pediatrics. 2015 Nov;136 Suppl 2:S196-218
pubmed: 26471383
J Reprod Med. 1994 Nov;39(11):888-98
pubmed: 7853281
Neonatology. 2023;120(2):161-175
pubmed: 36754038
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 16;6:CD012671
pubmed: 34133025
Ann Saudi Med. 2019 Mar-Apr;39(2):87-91
pubmed: 30955017
Neonatal Netw. 2008 Mar-Apr;27(2):81-7
pubmed: 18431962
Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1 Pt 1):1-7
pubmed: 10617696
Pediatrics. 1995 Nov;96(5 Pt 1):918-22
pubmed: 7478836
J Perinatol. 2008 Dec;28 Suppl 3:S3-7
pubmed: 19057607
Am Fam Physician. 2020 Aug 1;102(3):158-167
pubmed: 32735438
J Pediatr. 2001 Jan;138(1):92-100
pubmed: 11148519
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Sep;228:65-70
pubmed: 29909265
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):SC10-2
pubmed: 26557585
Pediatrics. 1993 May;91(5):969-75
pubmed: 8474818
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Dec;34(24):4141-4147
pubmed: 31900012
Hosp Pediatr. 2020 Mar;10(3):295-299
pubmed: 32094237
Cureus. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):e20427
pubmed: 35047264
Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;142(6):
pubmed: 30385640
Neonatal Netw. 2018 May 1;37(3):169-177
pubmed: 29789058

Auteurs

Ashley L Saint-Fleur (AL)

Department of Pediatrics, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.

Héctor E Alcalá (HE)

Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, United States of America.
Program in Oncology, University of Maryland Marlene and Stewart Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.

Shanthy Sridhar (S)

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH