Are iodophor-impregnated drapes associated with lower intraoperative contamination compared to no adhesive drape?: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Aug 2023
11 Aug 2023
Historique:
medline:
14
8
2023
pubmed:
11
8
2023
entrez:
11
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frightening complications after surgery. Adhesive drapes (AD) are widely used as an infection prevention tool. They can be non-impregnated or iodophor-impregnated, although non-impregnated are less used as they might be related to higher number of infections. One of the most common ways to study their efficacy is by analyzing the intraoperative contamination, which is a useful primary endpoint as it does not need follow-up and it has been strongly associated with infections. Therefore, we believe a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis is needed to determine which is the literature available about this topic and to explore their results. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) published since 1984 through to January 15, 2023 will be included. Non-human and experimental studies will be excluded. We will only include studies written in English. We will conduct searches in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS and Web Of Science. The protocol of the SR was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42023391651 and was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol guidelines. The evidence regarding the benefits of using iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes (IIAD) is scarce. Therefore, this SR and meta-analysis is required to determine if they are related with a lower intraoperative contamination incidence, compared to no AD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frightening complications after surgery. Adhesive drapes (AD) are widely used as an infection prevention tool. They can be non-impregnated or iodophor-impregnated, although non-impregnated are less used as they might be related to higher number of infections. One of the most common ways to study their efficacy is by analyzing the intraoperative contamination, which is a useful primary endpoint as it does not need follow-up and it has been strongly associated with infections. Therefore, we believe a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis is needed to determine which is the literature available about this topic and to explore their results.
METHODS
METHODS
All randomized controlled trials (RCT) published since 1984 through to January 15, 2023 will be included. Non-human and experimental studies will be excluded. We will only include studies written in English. We will conduct searches in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), SCOPUS and Web Of Science. The protocol of the SR was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42023391651 and was written according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol guidelines.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence regarding the benefits of using iodophor-impregnated adhesive drapes (IIAD) is scarce. Therefore, this SR and meta-analysis is required to determine if they are related with a lower intraoperative contamination incidence, compared to no AD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37565893
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034641
pii: 00005792-202308110-00052
pmc: PMC10419763
doi:
Substances chimiques
Adhesives
0
Iodophors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e34641Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Condon R, Sherertz R, Gaynes RP, et al. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1992;13:606–8.
Chopra T, Zhao JJ, Alangaden G, et al. Preventing surgical site infections after bariatric surgery: value of perioperative antibiotic regimens. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2010;10:317–28.
Nichols RL. Surgical infections: prevention and treatment - 1965 to 1995. Am J Surg. 1996;172:68–74.
Swenson BR, Camp TR, Mulloy DP, et al. Antimicrobial-impregnated surgical incise drapes in the prevention of mesh infection after ventral hernia repair. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008;9:23–32.
Milandt N, Nymark T, Jørn Kolmos H, et al. Iodine-impregnated incision drape and bacterial recolonization in simulated total knee arthroplasty: a controlled, randomized experimental trial. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:380–5.
Payne T. An adhesive surgical drape. Am J Surg. 1956. Available at: http://www.thomsoninnovation.com/tip-innovation/%5Cnhttp://www.thomsoninnovation.com/tip-innovation/recordView.do?datasource=T3&category=PAT&selRecord=1&totalRecords=1&databaseIds=PATENT&recordKeys=JP52009034A_19770124 .
Berriós-Torres SI, Umscheid CA, Bratzler DW, et al. Centers for disease control and prevention guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2017. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:784–91.
Webster J, Alghamdi A. Use of plastic adhesive drapes during surgery for preventing surgical site infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015:CD006353.
Chiu KY, Lau SK, Fung B, et al. Plastic adhesive drapes and wound infection after hip fracture surgery. Aust N Z J Surg. 1993;63:798–801.
Fergus M, Dewan P. The use of an iodophor-impregnated plastic incise drape in abdominal surgery - A controlled clinical trial. Surg Res. 1987.
Segal CG, Anderson JJ. Preoperative skin preparation of cardiac patients. AORN J. 2002;76:821–8.
Rezapoor M, Tan TL, Maltenfort MG, et al. Incise draping reduces the rate of contamination of the surgical site during hip surgery: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1891–5.
Hesselvig AB, Arpi M, Madsen F, et al. Does an antimicrobial incision drape prevent intraoperative contamination? A randomized controlled trial of 1187 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:1007–15.
Knobben BAS, Engelsma Y, Neut D, et al. Intraoperative contamination influences wound discharge and periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:236–41.
Mundi R, Nucci N, Ekhtiari S, et al. Do adhesive drapes have an effect on infection rates in orthopaedic surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022;480:551–9.
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647.
Haddaway NR, Page MJ, Pritchard CC, et al. PRISMA2020: an R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2022;18:1–12.
Jpt H, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane. 2022. Available at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook . 2022;3(February):2022.
Perencevich EN, Sands KE, Cosgrove SE, et al. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:196–203.
Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, et al. The impact of surgical-site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999;20:725–30.
Anaya DA, Dellinger EP. The obese surgical patient. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7:473–80.
Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care–associated infections. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1198–208.