Performance of a Mobile 3D Camera to Evaluate Simulated Pathological Gait in Practical Scenarios.

3D cameras gait analysis gait kinematics inertial sensors neurological disorders

Journal

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 08 06 2023
revised: 24 07 2023
accepted: 02 08 2023
medline: 14 8 2023
pubmed: 12 8 2023
entrez: 12 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Three-dimensional (3D) cameras used for gait assessment obviate the need for bodily markers or sensors, making them particularly interesting for clinical applications. Due to their limited field of view, their application has predominantly focused on evaluating gait patterns within short walking distances. However, assessment of gait consistency requires testing over a longer walking distance. The aim of this study is to validate the accuracy for gait assessment of a previously developed method that determines walking spatiotemporal parameters and kinematics measured with a 3D camera mounted on a mobile robot base (ROBOGait). Walking parameters measured with this system were compared with measurements with Xsens IMUs. The experiments were performed on a non-linear corridor of approximately 50 m, resembling the environment of a conventional rehabilitation facility. Eleven individuals exhibiting normal motor function were recruited to walk and to simulate gait patterns representative of common neurological conditions: Cerebral Palsy, Multiple Sclerosis, and Cerebellar Ataxia. Generalized estimating equations were used to determine statistical differences between the measurement systems and between walking conditions. When comparing walking parameters between paired measures of the systems, significant differences were found for eight out of 18 descriptors: range of motion (ROM) of trunk and pelvis tilt, maximum knee flexion in loading response, knee position at toe-off, stride length, step time, cadence; and stance duration. When analyzing how ROBOGait can distinguish simulated pathological gait from physiological gait, a mean accuracy of 70.4%, a sensitivity of 49.3%, and a specificity of 74.4% were found when compared with the Xsens system. The most important gait abnormalities related to the clinical conditions were successfully detected by ROBOGait. The descriptors that best distinguished simulated pathological walking from normal walking in both systems were step width and stride length. This study underscores the promising potential of 3D cameras and encourages exploring their use in clinical gait analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37571727
pii: s23156944
doi: 10.3390/s23156944
pmc: PMC10422615
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Références

Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:154-163
pubmed: 29220753
Gait Posture. 2017 May;54:194-201
pubmed: 28340371
J Biomech. 2005 May;38(5):981-992
pubmed: 15844264
J Med Eng Technol. 2014 Jul;38(5):274-80
pubmed: 24878252
Gait Posture. 2017 Jan;51:77-83
pubmed: 27721202
Gait Posture. 2008 May;27(4):710-4
pubmed: 17723303
J Neurol Phys Ther. 2011 Dec;35(4):164-9
pubmed: 22052130
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 14;12(4):e0175813
pubmed: 28410413
J Biomech. 2022 Mar;133:110953
pubmed: 35092908
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2018 Nov;59:15-18
pubmed: 30114546
Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;41(4):469-88
pubmed: 20868879
Sensors (Basel). 2016 Feb 04;16(2):194
pubmed: 26861323
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Sep;26(9):1317-9
pubmed: 25276007
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Oct;20(sup1):111-112
pubmed: 29088586
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;73(3):310-2
pubmed: 12185166
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015 Nov;10(6):458-467
pubmed: 24796365
Gait Posture. 2017 Jan;51:25-35
pubmed: 27693958
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Oct 13;21(20):
pubmed: 34695999

Auteurs

Diego Guffanti (D)

Centro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos-MIST, Universidad Indoamérica, Av. Machala y Sabanilla, Quito 170103, Ecuador.
Universidad UTE, Av. Mariscal Sucre, Quito 170129, Ecuador.

Daniel Lemus (D)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.

Heike Vallery (H)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands.

Alberto Brunete (A)

Centre for Automation and Robotics (CAR UPM-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28012 Madrid, Spain.

Miguel Hernando (M)

Centre for Automation and Robotics (CAR UPM-CSIC), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28012 Madrid, Spain.

Herwin Horemans (H)

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH