Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning.

Critical thinking Doctoral Student Experimental design Graduate Problem-based learning Training

Journal

BMC medical education
ISSN: 1472-6920
Titre abrégé: BMC Med Educ
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088679

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 04 03 2023
accepted: 05 08 2023
medline: 18 8 2023
pubmed: 17 8 2023
entrez: 16 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Traditionally, doctoral student education in the biomedical sciences relies on didactic coursework to build a foundation of scientific knowledge and an apprenticeship model of training in the laboratory of an established investigator. Recent recommendations for revision of graduate training include the utilization of graduate student competencies to assess progress and the introduction of novel curricula focused on development of skills, rather than accumulation of facts. Evidence demonstrates that active learning approaches are effective. Several facets of active learning are components of problem-based learning (PBL), which is a teaching modality where student learning is self-directed toward solving problems in a relevant context. These concepts were combined and incorporated in creating a new introductory graduate course designed to develop scientific skills (student competencies) in matriculating doctoral students using a PBL format. Evaluation of course effectiveness was measured using the principals of the Kirkpatrick Four Level Model of Evaluation. At the end of each course offering, students completed evaluation surveys on the course and instructors to assess their perceptions of training effectiveness. Pre- and post-tests assessing students' proficiency in experimental design were used to measure student learning. The analysis of the outcomes of the course suggests the training is effective in improving experimental design. The course was well received by the students as measured by student evaluations (Kirkpatrick Model Level 1). Improved scores on post-tests indicate that the students learned from the experience (Kirkpatrick Model Level 2). A template is provided for the implementation of similar courses at other institutions. This problem-based learning course appears effective in training newly matriculated graduate students in the required skills for designing experiments to test specific hypotheses, enhancing student preparation prior to initiation of their dissertation research.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Traditionally, doctoral student education in the biomedical sciences relies on didactic coursework to build a foundation of scientific knowledge and an apprenticeship model of training in the laboratory of an established investigator. Recent recommendations for revision of graduate training include the utilization of graduate student competencies to assess progress and the introduction of novel curricula focused on development of skills, rather than accumulation of facts. Evidence demonstrates that active learning approaches are effective. Several facets of active learning are components of problem-based learning (PBL), which is a teaching modality where student learning is self-directed toward solving problems in a relevant context. These concepts were combined and incorporated in creating a new introductory graduate course designed to develop scientific skills (student competencies) in matriculating doctoral students using a PBL format.
METHODS METHODS
Evaluation of course effectiveness was measured using the principals of the Kirkpatrick Four Level Model of Evaluation. At the end of each course offering, students completed evaluation surveys on the course and instructors to assess their perceptions of training effectiveness. Pre- and post-tests assessing students' proficiency in experimental design were used to measure student learning.
RESULTS RESULTS
The analysis of the outcomes of the course suggests the training is effective in improving experimental design. The course was well received by the students as measured by student evaluations (Kirkpatrick Model Level 1). Improved scores on post-tests indicate that the students learned from the experience (Kirkpatrick Model Level 2). A template is provided for the implementation of similar courses at other institutions.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This problem-based learning course appears effective in training newly matriculated graduate students in the required skills for designing experiments to test specific hypotheses, enhancing student preparation prior to initiation of their dissertation research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37587476
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7
pii: 10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7
pmc: PMC10428545
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

579

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM133369
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Winter;10(4):368-78
pubmed: 22135371
mBio. 2016 Nov 8;7(6):
pubmed: 27834205
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 1;112(35):10832-6
pubmed: 26195768
J Med Educ. 1974 Nov;49(11):1040-50
pubmed: 4444006
Nature. 2018 Feb;554(7692):277
pubmed: 32094741
Acad Med. 1992 Sep;67(9):557-65
pubmed: 1520409
Med Teach. 2005 Dec;27(8):676-81
pubmed: 16451886
Elife. 2018 May 31;7:
pubmed: 29848440
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):367-369
pubmed: 29946411
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Dec;37(12):1523-1527
pubmed: 31796928
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 18;12(9):e0184130
pubmed: 28922403
Science. 2004 Apr 23;304(5670):521-2
pubmed: 15105480
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Spring;12(1):59-72
pubmed: 23463229
mBio. 2017 Dec 19;8(6):
pubmed: 29259084
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Fall;10(3):239-49
pubmed: 21885820
Syst Res Behav Sci. 2015 May-Jun;23(3):402-405
pubmed: 26190914
mBio. 2016 Aug 30;7(4):
pubmed: 27578756
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0185023
pubmed: 28931079
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36307
pubmed: 22567149
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0177035
pubmed: 28542304
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 17;22(1):104
pubmed: 35177063
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2014 Fall;13(3):540-51
pubmed: 25185236
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 10;111(23):8410-5
pubmed: 24821756

Auteurs

Michael D Schaller (MD)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. mschaller@hsc.wvu.edu.

Marieta Gencheva (M)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.

Michael R Gunther (MR)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.

Scott A Weed (SA)

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center 64 Medical Center Drive, P.O. Box 9142, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH