Improving knowledge-based treatment planning for lung cancer radiotherapy with automatic multi-criteria optimized training plans.

Automated treatment planning Erasmus-iCycle RapidPlan iCE knowledge-based planning locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) multi-criteria optimization (MCO) radiotherapy

Journal

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
ISSN: 1651-226X
Titre abrégé: Acta Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8709065

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 8 11 2023
pubmed: 17 8 2023
entrez: 17 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared to manual planning, but its performance depends on the quality of the training plans. We used another system for automated planning, which generates multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans based on a wish list, to create training plans for the KBP model, to allow seamless integration of knowledge from a new system into clinical routine. Model performance was compared for KBP models trained with manually created and automatic MCO treatment plans. Two RapidPlan models with the same 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients included were created, one containing manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one containing fully automatic multi-criteria optimized plans (RP_MCO). For 15 validation patients, model performance was compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities, and an oncologist performed a blind comparison of the clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans. The heart and esophagus doses were lower for RP_MCO compared to RP_CLIN, resulting in an average reduction in the risk of 2-year mortality by 0.9 percentage points and the risk of acute esophageal toxicity by 1.6 percentage points with RP_MCO. The oncologist preferred the RP_MCO plan for 8 patients and the CLIN plan for 7 patients, while the RP_CLIN plan was not preferred for any patients. RP_MCO improved OAR sparing compared to RP_CLIN and was selected for implementation in the clinic. Training a KBP model with clinical plans may lead to suboptimal output plans, and making an extra effort to optimize the library plans in the KBP model creation phase can improve the plan quality for many future patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a method for automated radiotherapy treatment planning where appropriate optimization objectives for new patients are predicted based on a library of training plans. KBP can save time and improve organ at-risk sparing and inter-patient consistency compared to manual planning, but its performance depends on the quality of the training plans. We used another system for automated planning, which generates multi-criteria optimized (MCO) plans based on a wish list, to create training plans for the KBP model, to allow seamless integration of knowledge from a new system into clinical routine. Model performance was compared for KBP models trained with manually created and automatic MCO treatment plans.
MATERIAL AND METHODS UNASSIGNED
Two RapidPlan models with the same 30 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients included were created, one containing manually created clinical plans (RP_CLIN) and one containing fully automatic multi-criteria optimized plans (RP_MCO). For 15 validation patients, model performance was compared in terms of dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities, and an oncologist performed a blind comparison of the clinical (CLIN), RP_CLIN, and RP_MCO plans.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
The heart and esophagus doses were lower for RP_MCO compared to RP_CLIN, resulting in an average reduction in the risk of 2-year mortality by 0.9 percentage points and the risk of acute esophageal toxicity by 1.6 percentage points with RP_MCO. The oncologist preferred the RP_MCO plan for 8 patients and the CLIN plan for 7 patients, while the RP_CLIN plan was not preferred for any patients.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
RP_MCO improved OAR sparing compared to RP_CLIN and was selected for implementation in the clinic. Training a KBP model with clinical plans may lead to suboptimal output plans, and making an extra effort to optimize the library plans in the KBP model creation phase can improve the plan quality for many future patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37589124
doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2238882
doi:

Substances chimiques

MCO 56369-20-1

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1194-1200

Auteurs

Kristine Fjellanger (K)

Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Institute of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Marte Hordnes (M)

Institute of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Inger Marie Sandvik (IM)

Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Turid Husevåg Sulen (TH)

Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Ben J M Heijmen (BJM)

Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Sebastiaan Breedveld (S)

Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Linda Rossi (L)

Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Helge Egil Seime Pettersen (HES)

Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

Liv Bolstad Hysing (LB)

Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Institute of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH