Effects of thickness and polishing treatment on the translucency and opalescence of six dental CAD-CAM monolithic restorative materials: an in vitro study.
CAD-CAM Materials
Opalescence
Roughening
Thickness
Translucency
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 08 2023
19 08 2023
Historique:
received:
19
06
2023
accepted:
10
08
2023
medline:
21
8
2023
pubmed:
20
8
2023
entrez:
19
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials for prosthetic is gaining popularity in dentistry. However, limited information exists regarding the impact of thickness and roughening treatment on the optical properties of contemporary CAD-CAM restorative materials. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the translucency and opalescence of six dental CAD-CAM materials in response to different thicknesses and roughening treatments. Six dental CAD-CAM materials, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (VITA Enamic, VE), resin-nano ceramic glass-ceramic (LAVA Ultimate, LU), polymethyl methacrylate (Telio CAD, TE), and two zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (VITA Suprinity, VS, and Celtra Duo, CD), in shade A2 were prepared as 12 × 12mm The TP Variations in translucency caused by thickness and roughening treatment were perceptible and may be clinically unacceptable. Careful consideration should be given to the selection of CAD-CAM materials based on their distinct optical properties.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials for prosthetic is gaining popularity in dentistry. However, limited information exists regarding the impact of thickness and roughening treatment on the optical properties of contemporary CAD-CAM restorative materials. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the translucency and opalescence of six dental CAD-CAM materials in response to different thicknesses and roughening treatments.
METHODS
Six dental CAD-CAM materials, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max CAD, LS), polymer-infiltrated ceramic (VITA Enamic, VE), resin-nano ceramic glass-ceramic (LAVA Ultimate, LU), polymethyl methacrylate (Telio CAD, TE), and two zirconia reinforced lithium silicate (VITA Suprinity, VS, and Celtra Duo, CD), in shade A2 were prepared as 12 × 12mm
RESULTS
The TP
CONCLUSIONS
Variations in translucency caused by thickness and roughening treatment were perceptible and may be clinically unacceptable. Careful consideration should be given to the selection of CAD-CAM materials based on their distinct optical properties.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37598167
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03299-y
pii: 10.1186/s12903-023-03299-y
pmc: PMC10440033
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
579Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):683-689
pubmed: 30527568
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):149-154
pubmed: 31027961
J Dent. 2022 Oct;125:104223
pubmed: 35839964
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Apr;121(4):712.e1-712.e8
pubmed: 30929661
Dent Mater J. 2023 Jan 31;42(1):30-41
pubmed: 36244738
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Sep;31(5):478-485
pubmed: 31155848
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 May;127(5):801.e1-801.e8
pubmed: 35153063
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016 Mar;28 Suppl 1:S46-55
pubmed: 26923662
J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e2-16
pubmed: 20621154
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jul;128(1):92.e1-92.e7
pubmed: 35595548
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jul;33(5):795-806
pubmed: 33866673
Materials (Basel). 2023 Mar 14;16(6):
pubmed: 36984216
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Mar;32(2):171-181
pubmed: 31943720
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Mar 15;15(6):
pubmed: 36987234
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Apr;119(4):593-599
pubmed: 28781072
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Mar;123(3):530.e1-530.e6
pubmed: 31916977
Dent Mater. 2015 Oct;31(10):1180-7
pubmed: 26198027
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Sep;126(3):446.e1-446.e6
pubmed: 34304886
Dent Mater. 2016 Jul;32(7):908-14
pubmed: 27087687
J Adv Prosthodont. 2016 Feb;8(1):37-42
pubmed: 26949486
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Aug;128(2):217.e1-217.e9
pubmed: 35817621
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Dec;33(8):1084-1104
pubmed: 34498789
J Dent Res. 1980 Jan;59(1):70-5
pubmed: 6927988
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):864-70
pubmed: 24969410
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jan;32(1):43-50
pubmed: 31583835
Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 26;13(5):
pubmed: 32110874
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019 Aug;11(4):215-222
pubmed: 31497269
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jun;113(6):534-40
pubmed: 25749093
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018 Sep;30(5):434-441
pubmed: 29920916
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):263-268
pubmed: 29551378
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Dec;122(6):567.e1-567.e8
pubmed: 31699448
Dent Mater. 2009 Dec;25(12):1564-8
pubmed: 19709725
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):224-31
pubmed: 24974858
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Mar;35(2):381-389
pubmed: 36533557
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Mar;31(2):103-112
pubmed: 30891913
J Dent. 2014 Sep;42(9):1202-9
pubmed: 25019364
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Oct;33(7):1017-1028
pubmed: 34105868
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Jul;110(1):14-20
pubmed: 23849609
J Dent Res. 2019 Nov;98(12):1294-1304
pubmed: 31633462
Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Jun 4;24(2):147-155
pubmed: 34085500
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014 Jul-Aug;26(4):217-23
pubmed: 24975048
J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;30(4):318-328
pubmed: 32813300
J Dent. 2007 Aug;35(8):690-4
pubmed: 17618727
J Dent. 2012 Dec;40 Suppl 2:e77-82
pubmed: 22955005
J Physiol. 2016 Oct 1;594(19):5415-26
pubmed: 27218707
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jun 20;15(12):
pubmed: 35744423
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Jul 15;17(1):16
pubmed: 27418002
Materials (Basel). 2021 Mar 24;14(7):
pubmed: 33805176
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Dec;114(6):848-55
pubmed: 26346420
Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Dec;19(9):2309-18
pubmed: 25797414
Dent Mater. 2018 Aug;34(8):1168-1174
pubmed: 29764698
Dent Mater J. 2015;34(6):881-7
pubmed: 26632238