Fully Closed-Loop Glucose Control Compared With Insulin Pump Therapy With Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes and Suboptimal Glycemic Control: A Single-Center, Randomized, Crossover Study.
Humans
Adult
Middle Aged
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
/ drug therapy
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Insulin
/ therapeutic use
Blood Glucose
Cross-Over Studies
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Insulin Lispro
/ therapeutic use
Treatment Outcome
Insulin Infusion Systems
Insulin, Regular, Human
/ therapeutic use
Journal
Diabetes care
ISSN: 1935-5548
Titre abrégé: Diabetes Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7805975
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2023
01 11 2023
Historique:
received:
22
04
2023
accepted:
01
08
2023
medline:
30
10
2023
pubmed:
24
8
2023
entrez:
24
8
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the safety and efficacy of fully closed-loop with ultrarapid insulin lispro in adults with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control compared with insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). This single-center, randomized, crossover study enrolled 26 adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy with suboptimal glycemic control (mean ± SD, age 41 ± 12 years, HbA1c 9.2 ± 1.1% [77 ± 12 mmol/mol]). Participants underwent two 8-week periods of unrestricted living to compare fully closed-loop with ultrarapid insulin lispro (CamAPS HX system) with insulin pump therapy with CGM in random order. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the proportion of time glucose was in range (primary end point 3.9-10.0 mmol/L) was higher during closed-loop than during pump with CGM (mean ± SD 50.0 ± 9.6% vs. 36.2 ± 12.2%, mean difference 13.2 percentage points [95% CI 9.5, 16.9], P < 0.001). Time with glucose >10.0 mmol/L and mean glucose were lower during closed-loop than during pump with CGM (mean ± SD time >10.0 mmol/L: 49.0 ± 9.9 vs. 62.9 ± 12.6%, mean difference -13.3 percentage points [95% CI -17.2, -9.5], P < 0.001; mean ± SD glucose 10.7 ± 1.1 vs. 12.0 ± 1.6 mmol/L, mean difference -1.2 mmol/L [95% CI -1.8, -0.7], P < 0.001). The proportion of time with glucose <3.9 mmol/L was similar between periods (median [interquartile range (IQR)] closed-loop 0.88% [0.51-1.55] vs. pump with CGM 0.64% [0.28-1.10], P = 0.102). Total daily insulin requirements did not differ (median [IQR] closed-loop 51.9 units/day [35.7-91.2] vs. pump with CGM 50.7 units/day [34.0-70.0], P = 0.704). No severe hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis occurred. Fully closed-loop insulin delivery with CamAPS HX improved glucose control compared with insulin pump therapy with CGM in adults with type 1 diabetes and suboptimal glycemic control.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37616583
pii: 153534
doi: 10.2337/dc23-0728
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Insulin
0
Blood Glucose
0
Insulin Lispro
0
Insulin, Regular, Human
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04977908']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1916-1922Informations de copyright
© 2023 by the American Diabetes Association.