Related neural networks underlie suppression of emotion, memory, motor processes as identified by data-driven analysis.

Emotion regulation Independent component analysis Inhibitory control Intrinsic connectivity networks Memory suppression Motor inhibition

Journal

BMC neuroscience
ISSN: 1471-2202
Titre abrégé: BMC Neurosci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966986

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 08 2023
Historique:
received: 30 04 2022
accepted: 14 07 2023
medline: 28 8 2023
pubmed: 25 8 2023
entrez: 24 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Goal-directed behavior benefits from self-regulation of cognitive and affective processes, such as emotional reactivity, memory retrieval, and prepotent motor response. Dysfunction in self-regulation is a common characteristic of many psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD and ADHD. This study sought to determine whether common intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs; e.g. default mode network) are involved in the regulation of emotion, motor, and memory processes, and if a data-driven approach using independent component analysis (ICA) would successfully identify such ICNs that contribute to inhibitory regulation. Eighteen participants underwent neuroimaging while completing an emotion regulation (ER) task, a memory suppression (Think/No-Think; TNT) task, and a motor inhibition (Stop Signal; SS) task. ICA (CONN; MATLAB) was conducted on the neuroimaging data from each task and corresponding components were selected across tasks based on interrelated patterns of activation. Subsequently, ICNs were correlated with behavioral performance variables from each task. ICA indicated a common medial prefrontal network, striatal network, and frontoparietal executive control network, as well as downregulation in task-specific ROIs. These results illustrate that common ICNs were exhibited across three distinct inhibitory regulation tasks, as successfully identified through a data-driven approach (ICA).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Goal-directed behavior benefits from self-regulation of cognitive and affective processes, such as emotional reactivity, memory retrieval, and prepotent motor response. Dysfunction in self-regulation is a common characteristic of many psychiatric disorders, such as PTSD and ADHD. This study sought to determine whether common intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs; e.g. default mode network) are involved in the regulation of emotion, motor, and memory processes, and if a data-driven approach using independent component analysis (ICA) would successfully identify such ICNs that contribute to inhibitory regulation.
METHODS
Eighteen participants underwent neuroimaging while completing an emotion regulation (ER) task, a memory suppression (Think/No-Think; TNT) task, and a motor inhibition (Stop Signal; SS) task. ICA (CONN; MATLAB) was conducted on the neuroimaging data from each task and corresponding components were selected across tasks based on interrelated patterns of activation. Subsequently, ICNs were correlated with behavioral performance variables from each task.
RESULTS
ICA indicated a common medial prefrontal network, striatal network, and frontoparietal executive control network, as well as downregulation in task-specific ROIs.
CONCLUSIONS
These results illustrate that common ICNs were exhibited across three distinct inhibitory regulation tasks, as successfully identified through a data-driven approach (ICA).

Identifiants

pubmed: 37620756
doi: 10.1186/s12868-023-00812-5
pii: 10.1186/s12868-023-00812-5
pmc: PMC10463822
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

44

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2016 Oct;134 Pt A:145-161
pubmed: 26642918
Neuroscientist. 2019 Jun;25(3):258-270
pubmed: 29985120
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Mar;21(3):539-49
pubmed: 20584747
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):170-7
pubmed: 15050513
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2121-30
pubmed: 24658634
Curr Biol. 2019 Apr 22;29(8):1313-1323.e5
pubmed: 30982651
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Apr;20(2):387-407
pubmed: 32133586
Cereb Cortex. 2011 May;21(5):1155-65
pubmed: 20923963
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Apr;26(4):1634-1646
pubmed: 25601236
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 10;14(4):e0213861
pubmed: 30970031
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1215-29
pubmed: 12495527
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 12;13(1):274
pubmed: 35022447
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007 Dec;2(4):303-12
pubmed: 18985136
Neuron. 2017 Jan 18;93(2):259-280
pubmed: 28103476
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Mar 15;57(6):624-32
pubmed: 15780849
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Feb 1;57(3):210-9
pubmed: 15691521
Science. 2004 Jan 9;303(5655):232-5
pubmed: 14716015
Science. 2007 Jul 13;317(5835):215-9
pubmed: 17626877
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 15;107:146-162
pubmed: 25482265
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Mar;8(3):341-50
pubmed: 22275168
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2010 May;10(2):182-94
pubmed: 20498343
J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Nov 5;33(12):2559-2588
pubmed: 34644388
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2008 Apr;11(2):143-162
pubmed: 29743808
Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):290-2
pubmed: 14551436
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 18;7:11195
pubmed: 27088156
J Neurosci. 2021 Mar 17;41(11):2447-2456
pubmed: 33376157
Neuron. 2012 Oct 18;76(2):450-60
pubmed: 23083745
J Neurosci. 2006 Mar 1;26(9):2424-33
pubmed: 16510720
Neuroimage. 2010 Nov 1;53(2):653-63
pubmed: 20600962
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018 Jun;20(2):133-140
pubmed: 30250390
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jan 8;108:117-134
pubmed: 29199109
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31546
pubmed: 22384038
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):8301-6
pubmed: 10393989
Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Mar 01;10:17
pubmed: 26973474
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 1;111(13):E1310-9
pubmed: 24639546
Neuroscientist. 2014 Apr;20(2):150-9
pubmed: 23835449
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 26;7(1):6537
pubmed: 28747717
PLoS One. 2010 Nov 04;5(11):e13848
pubmed: 21079814
Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4(1):58-73
pubmed: 20408186
Neuroscientist. 2014 Dec;20(6):652-64
pubmed: 24622818
Sci Rep. 2018 May 23;8(1):8029
pubmed: 29795119
Nature. 2001 Mar 15;410(6826):366-9
pubmed: 11268212
J Neurophysiol. 2011 Sep;106(3):1125-65
pubmed: 21653723
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Aug;19(8):445-52
pubmed: 26160027
Neurotox Res. 2006 Oct;10(2):113-21
pubmed: 17062373
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 22;8(1):3460
pubmed: 29472625

Auteurs

Karisa J Hunt (KJ)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 2301 S, 3rd St., Louisville, KY, 40292, USA. Karisa.Hunt@Louisville.edu.

Lindsay K Knight (LK)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 2301 S, 3rd St., Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.
Insightec Ltd., Chicago, IL, USA.

Brendan E Depue (BE)

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, 2301 S, 3rd St., Louisville, KY, 40292, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH