Use of Routine Emergency Department Care Practices with Deaf American Sign Language Users.


Journal

The Journal of emergency medicine
ISSN: 0736-4679
Titre abrégé: J Emerg Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8412174

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 2023
Historique:
received: 12 08 2022
revised: 20 04 2023
accepted: 26 05 2023
pmc-release: 01 09 2024
medline: 11 9 2023
pubmed: 29 8 2023
entrez: 28 8 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Deaf individuals who communicate using American Sign Language (ASL) seem to experience a range of disparities in health care, but there are few empirical data. To examine the provision of common care practices in the emergency department (ED) to this population. ED visits in 2018 at a U.S. academic medical center were assessed retrospectively in Deaf adults who primarily use ASL (n = 257) and hearing individuals who primarily use English, selected at random (n = 429). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders compared the groups on the provision or nonprovision of four routine ED care practices (i.e., laboratories ordered, medications ordered, images ordered, placement of peripheral intravenous line [PIV]) and on ED disposition (admitted to hospital or not admitted). The ED encounters with Deaf ASL users were less likely to include laboratory tests being ordered: adjusted odds ratio 0.68 and 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.97. ED encounters with Deaf individuals were also less likely to include PIV placement, less likely to result in images being ordered in the ED care of ASL users of high acuity compared with English users of high acuity (but not low acuity), and less likely to result in hospital admission. Results suggest disparate provision of several types of routine ED care for adult Deaf ASL users. Limitations include the observational study design at a single site and reliance on the medical record, underscoring the need for further research and potential reasons for disparate ED care with Deaf individuals.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Deaf individuals who communicate using American Sign Language (ASL) seem to experience a range of disparities in health care, but there are few empirical data.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the provision of common care practices in the emergency department (ED) to this population.
METHODS
ED visits in 2018 at a U.S. academic medical center were assessed retrospectively in Deaf adults who primarily use ASL (n = 257) and hearing individuals who primarily use English, selected at random (n = 429). Logistic regression analyses adjusted for confounders compared the groups on the provision or nonprovision of four routine ED care practices (i.e., laboratories ordered, medications ordered, images ordered, placement of peripheral intravenous line [PIV]) and on ED disposition (admitted to hospital or not admitted).
RESULTS
The ED encounters with Deaf ASL users were less likely to include laboratory tests being ordered: adjusted odds ratio 0.68 and 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.97. ED encounters with Deaf individuals were also less likely to include PIV placement, less likely to result in images being ordered in the ED care of ASL users of high acuity compared with English users of high acuity (but not low acuity), and less likely to result in hospital admission.
CONCLUSION
Results suggest disparate provision of several types of routine ED care for adult Deaf ASL users. Limitations include the observational study design at a single site and reliance on the medical record, underscoring the need for further research and potential reasons for disparate ED care with Deaf individuals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37640633
pii: S0736-4679(23)00298-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.05.001
pmc: PMC10653031
mid: NIHMS1906330
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Observational Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e163-e171

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : K12 GM106997
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AA026815
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Références

CMAJ. 2008 Jun 3;178(12):1555-62
pubmed: 18519903
Qual Health Res. 2022 Jan;32(1):48-63
pubmed: 34823402
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Jan;21(1):1-10
pubmed: 26405210
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2019 Oct 1;24(4):378-385
pubmed: 31369098
Am J Public Health. 2011 Dec;101(12):2235-8
pubmed: 22021296
JAMA. 2008 Jan 2;299(1):70-8
pubmed: 18167408
Arch Fam Med. 2000 Jun;9(6):518-25, discussion 526
pubmed: 10862214
IARC Sci Publ. 1980;(32):5-338
pubmed: 7216345
Health Commun. 2015;30(8):830-7
pubmed: 24901350
Am Ann Deaf. 2010 Winter;154(5):486-92; discussion 493-6
pubmed: 20415284
Disabil Health J. 2022 Jul;15(3):101327
pubmed: 35581134
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2020 Jun;37(6):404-408
pubmed: 31607141
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2020 Apr;50(2):387-396
pubmed: 31721275
Disabil Health J. 2015 Oct;8(4):573-8
pubmed: 26166160
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2010 Fall;15(4):317-33
pubmed: 20554649
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 May 17;11(10):e024199
pubmed: 35506534
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):676-679
pubmed: 33963502
J Health Commun. 2015;20 Suppl 2:92-100
pubmed: 26513036
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Mar;21(3):260-6
pubmed: 16499543
Rehabil Psychol. 2009 May;54(2):182-5
pubmed: 19469608
Health Serv Res. 2002 Feb;37(1):105-20
pubmed: 11949915
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2002 Oct;11(8):729-41
pubmed: 12570039
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2005 Summer;10(3):291-310
pubmed: 15872148
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2014 Sep;26(9):504-510
pubmed: 24259249
Int J Emerg Med. 2009 Sep 01;2(3):161-6
pubmed: 20157466
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jul;41(1):75-9
pubmed: 21665066
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 25;7:300
pubmed: 32671081
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;56(1):42-8
pubmed: 20346540
Health Serv Res. 2013 Aug;48(4):1334-58
pubmed: 23278461
J Transcult Nurs. 2016 May;27(3):210-7
pubmed: 26122618
Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):390-397
pubmed: 29452067
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;17(8):801-8
pubmed: 20670316
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 2;140(5):356-62
pubmed: 14996677
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;29(11):1290-1300
pubmed: 35904003
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Oct 1;23(4):341-350
pubmed: 29860386

Auteurs

Kenneth R Conner (KR)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Courtney M Jones (CM)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Nancy Wood (N)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Aileen Aldalur (A)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Mariam Paracha (M)

Center for Health + Technology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York; Department of Science and Mathematics, National Technical Institute for the Deaf, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York.

Stephen J Powell (SJ)

Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Yunbo Nie (Y)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York.

Kevin M Dillon (KM)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Jason Rotoli (J)

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH