Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 08 2023
Historique:
medline: 1 9 2023
pubmed: 31 8 2023
entrez: 30 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), in a prenatal screening programme targeting common aneuploidies. A simulation study was conducted to study the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by NIPS (sex chromosome aneuploidies, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, large deletion/duplication >7 Mb and rare autosomal trisomies) to five basic strategies currently aiming the common trisomies: three strategies currently offered by the public healthcare systems in Canada, whose first-tier test is performed with biochemical markers, and two programmes whose first-tier test consists of NIPS-based methods. The total number of cases of chromosomal anomalies detected and the costs related to the consumption of medical services. The most effective and the most cost-effective option in almost all prenatal screening strategies is the option that includes all targeted additional conditions. In the strategies where NIPS is used as first-tier testing, the cost per additional case detected by adding all possible additional anomalies to a programme that currently targets only common trisomies is $C25 710 (95% CI $C25 489 to $C25 934) for massively parallel shotgun sequencing and $C57 711 (95% CI $C57 141 to $C58 292) for targeted massively parallel sequencing, respectively. The acceptability curves show that at a willingness-to-pay of $C50 000 per one additional case detected, the expansion of NIPS-based methods for the detection of all possible additional conditions has a 90% probability of being cost-effective. From an economic perspective, in strategies that use NIPS as a first-tier screening test, expanding the programmes to detect any considered chromosomal anomalies other than the three common trisomies would be cost-effective. However, the potential expansion of prenatal screening programmes also requires consideration of societal issues, including ethical ones.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37648381
pii: bmjopen-2022-069485
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069485
pmc: PMC10471875
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e069485

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;147:355-376
pubmed: 29325624
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017 Sep;39(9):805-817
pubmed: 28859766
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 10;11:CD011767
pubmed: 29125628
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jun;99(6):731-743
pubmed: 32166736
Health Policy Open. 2022 Jan 05;3:100063
pubmed: 37383570
Lancet. 2008 Nov 22;372(9652):1789-91
pubmed: 19027473
Aust Fam Physician. 2017 Oct;46(10):735-739
pubmed: 29036772
Health Hum Rights. 2017 Jun;19(1):13-27
pubmed: 28630538
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;22(3):264-7
pubmed: 12942498
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006 Sep 05;1:33
pubmed: 16953888
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750
pubmed: 21749752
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jan;40(1):48-60
pubmed: 28784564
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;44(1):122-3
pubmed: 24895295
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2013 May;56(3):160-6
pubmed: 24327996
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Apr;20(2):164-8
pubmed: 18388817
J Med Genet. 1992 Jun;29(6):400-6
pubmed: 1619635
Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;167:321-336
pubmed: 31753140
J Med Genet. 2018 Apr;55(4):215-221
pubmed: 29496978
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009 Mar 07;4:9
pubmed: 19267933
CMAJ. 2021 Aug 3;193(30):E1156-E1163
pubmed: 34344770
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(4):1-166
pubmed: 30847010
Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 May;20(5):521-6
pubmed: 22234154
Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2013 Jul;1(2):87-97
pubmed: 24498606
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 4;14(12):e0225281
pubmed: 31800591

Auteurs

Bounhome Soukkhaphone (B)

Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Mohammad Baradaran (M)

Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Ba Diep Nguyen (BD)

Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Leon Nshimyumukiza (L)

Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Institut National d'Excellence en Santé et Services Sociaux, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Julian Little (J)

University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Francois Rousseau (F)

Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Francois Audibert (F)

CHU Sainte-Justine, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Sylvie Langlois (S)

The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Daniel Reinharz (D)

Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada Daniel.Reinharz@fmed.ulaval.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH