Factors associated with hand washing effectiveness: an institution-based observational study.
Hand hygiene
Hand washing
Infection prevention and control
Standards
Journal
Antimicrobial resistance and infection control
ISSN: 2047-2994
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101585411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 08 2023
30 08 2023
Historique:
received:
30
05
2023
accepted:
24
08
2023
medline:
1
9
2023
pubmed:
31
8
2023
entrez:
30
8
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Few studies have investigated how the effectiveness of hand washing in removing hand contaminants is influenced by the performance and duration of each step involved. We conducted an observational study by recruiting participants from a university campus, with the aim to comprehensively evaluate how performance, duration and demographic factors influence hand washing effectiveness. A total of 744 videos were collected from 664 participants in July-October 2022 and independently evaluated by two infection control experts through labelling videos for correct and incorrect performance of each step. The individual hand washing effectiveness was determined by quantifying the percentage of residual fluorescent gel on the dorsum and palm areas of each participant's hands. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that were significantly associated with better hand washing effectiveness. An exposure-response relationship was constructed to identify optimal durations for each step. Approximately 2300 hand images were processed using advanced normalization algorithms and overlaid to visualize the areas with more fluorescence residuals after hand washing. Step 3 (rub between fingers) was the most frequently omitted step and step 4 (rub the dorsum of fingers) was the most frequently incorrectly performed step. After adjustment for covariates, sex, performance of step 4 and step 7 (rub wrists), rubbing hands during rinsing, and rinsing time were significantly associated with hand washing effectiveness. The optimal overall hand washing time was 31 s from step 1 to step 7, and 28 s from step 1 to step 6, with each step ideally lasting 4-5 s, except step 3. The palms of both hands had less fluorescence residuals than the dorsums. The areas where residuals most likely appeared were wrists, followed by finger tips, finger webs and thumbs. Performance and duration of some hand washing steps, sex and rinsing time were associated with hand washing effectiveness. The optimal duration might be applied to all seven steps to achieve the best decontamination results. Further studies are needed to refine hand hygiene standards and enhance compliance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Few studies have investigated how the effectiveness of hand washing in removing hand contaminants is influenced by the performance and duration of each step involved. We conducted an observational study by recruiting participants from a university campus, with the aim to comprehensively evaluate how performance, duration and demographic factors influence hand washing effectiveness.
METHODS
A total of 744 videos were collected from 664 participants in July-October 2022 and independently evaluated by two infection control experts through labelling videos for correct and incorrect performance of each step. The individual hand washing effectiveness was determined by quantifying the percentage of residual fluorescent gel on the dorsum and palm areas of each participant's hands. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that were significantly associated with better hand washing effectiveness. An exposure-response relationship was constructed to identify optimal durations for each step. Approximately 2300 hand images were processed using advanced normalization algorithms and overlaid to visualize the areas with more fluorescence residuals after hand washing.
RESULTS
Step 3 (rub between fingers) was the most frequently omitted step and step 4 (rub the dorsum of fingers) was the most frequently incorrectly performed step. After adjustment for covariates, sex, performance of step 4 and step 7 (rub wrists), rubbing hands during rinsing, and rinsing time were significantly associated with hand washing effectiveness. The optimal overall hand washing time was 31 s from step 1 to step 7, and 28 s from step 1 to step 6, with each step ideally lasting 4-5 s, except step 3. The palms of both hands had less fluorescence residuals than the dorsums. The areas where residuals most likely appeared were wrists, followed by finger tips, finger webs and thumbs.
CONCLUSIONS
Performance and duration of some hand washing steps, sex and rinsing time were associated with hand washing effectiveness. The optimal duration might be applied to all seven steps to achieve the best decontamination results. Further studies are needed to refine hand hygiene standards and enhance compliance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37649107
doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01293-1
pii: 10.1186/s13756-023-01293-1
pmc: PMC10469426
doi:
Types de publication
Observational Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
85Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Références
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 May 30;13:249
pubmed: 23718728
J Food Prot. 2015 Apr;78(4):685-90
pubmed: 25836392
J Environ Public Health. 2019 Aug 8;2019:5928924
pubmed: 31485238
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Sep;97(1):26-29
pubmed: 28579470
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 1;60(11):1690-9
pubmed: 25676799
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):401
pubmed: 30975130
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Mar 30;:
pubmed: 37003526
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Jan;119:33-48
pubmed: 34582962
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Dec 9-23;173(22):2039-46
pubmed: 23999949
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Apr;104(4):430-434
pubmed: 32068015
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 Jun;74(12):3739-44
pubmed: 18441107
Lancet. 2000 Oct 14;356(9238):1307-12
pubmed: 11073019
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):863-93, table of contents
pubmed: 15489352
J Surg Educ. 2015 May-Jun;72(3):530-5
pubmed: 25656633
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Dec 27;2019:7178645
pubmed: 31950052
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Mar;44(3):355-376
pubmed: 36751708
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Jun;47S:A46-A52
pubmed: 31146850
Med Image Anal. 2008 Feb;12(1):26-41
pubmed: 17659998
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Dec;130:20-33
pubmed: 36089071