The effect of masks on the emotion perception of a facial crowd.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 08 2023
Historique:
received: 28 02 2023
accepted: 25 08 2023
medline: 4 9 2023
pubmed: 1 9 2023
entrez: 31 8 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study investigated the effect of facial masks on people's ability to perceive emotions in crowds. We presented faces with the bottom halves occluded by masks or full faces without occlusion. In two sequentially presented crowds, we varied the number of faces, emotional valence, and intensity of facial expressions, examining the impact of masks on the perception of crowd emotion. Participants reported which of the two crowds they would avoid based on the crowds' average emotions. The participants' ability to judge the average emotion of a crowd, especially a crowd expressing happiness, was impaired when the crowd wore masks. For faces covered by masks, crowd emotion judgments were more negatively biased than those without masks. However, participants could still distinguish the emotional intensities of a crowd wearing masks above chance. Additionally, participants responded more quickly to a crowd with more people without compromising accuracy, despite the perceptual challenges imposed by facial masks. Our results suggest that under ambiguous social situations in which individuals' emotions are partially hidden by masks, a large group may provide stronger social cues than a small group, thereby promoting communication and regulating social behaviors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37653061
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41366-0
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-41366-0
pmc: PMC10471755
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

14274

Informations de copyright

© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2019 Jul;20(1):69-90
pubmed: 31313637
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1543-8
pubmed: 19682907
Int J Psychophysiol. 2021 Apr;162:157-165
pubmed: 33548347
Psychol Methods. 2017 Jun;22(2):322-339
pubmed: 26651986
Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):830-41
pubmed: 17638508
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Apr;83(3):970-981
pubmed: 33033987
Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:828-842
pubmed: 29226255
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Aug;27(4):602-606
pubmed: 32128720
Cognition. 1992 Sep;44(3):227-40
pubmed: 1424493
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Iperception. 2022 Jun 26;13(3):20416695221107391
pubmed: 35782826
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263466
pubmed: 35113970
J Vis. 2016;16(3):12
pubmed: 26873776
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Jun;36(6):2338-51
pubmed: 25716010
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Oct;72(7):1825-38
pubmed: 20952781
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:629-658
pubmed: 34280326
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 10;11(1):5577
pubmed: 33692417
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;15(3):122-31
pubmed: 21292539
J Vis. 2012 May 25;12(5):7
pubmed: 22637708
Emotion. 2006 May;6(2):193-207
pubmed: 16768552
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):445-460
pubmed: 31318257
Cognition. 1997 Jun;63(3):271-313
pubmed: 9265872
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Aug;21(4):776-792
pubmed: 33725334
Cogn Emot. 2014 Apr;28(3):416-32
pubmed: 24047413
Psychol Sci. 2003 Nov;14(6):644-7
pubmed: 14629700
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 21;10(1):22344
pubmed: 33349645
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0243708
pubmed: 33362251
Vision Res. 2018 Apr;145:39-48
pubmed: 29660371
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):63-79
pubmed: 31347018
Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jun 1;6(6):255-260
pubmed: 12039607
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):437-42
pubmed: 9176953
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 28;11(1):2601
pubmed: 33510195
J Exp Psychol. 1957 Nov;54(5):358-68
pubmed: 13481283
Brain Cogn. 2018 Nov;127:51-59
pubmed: 30316954
Cognition. 1995 Dec;57(3):217-39
pubmed: 8556842
Psychol Rev. 2023 Apr 03;:
pubmed: 37011150
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022 May;17(3):768-787
pubmed: 34797731
J Vis. 2011 Oct 26;11(12):
pubmed: 22031908
Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):482-98
pubmed: 9697428
Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):977-86
pubmed: 11105523
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Jun;35(3):718-34
pubmed: 19485687
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):550-563
pubmed: 31414859
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Aug;137(3):471-94
pubmed: 18729711
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):225-45
pubmed: 8316637
Vision Res. 2023 Feb;203:108156
pubmed: 36427456

Auteurs

Jieun Cho (J)

Graduate Program in Cognitive Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea.

Hee Yeon Im (HY)

Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Young Jun Yoon (YJ)

Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.

Sung Jun Joo (SJ)

Department of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.

Sang Chul Chong (SC)

Graduate Program in Cognitive Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. scchong@yonsei.ac.kr.
Department of Psychology, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea. scchong@yonsei.ac.kr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH