Medicine donations: a review of policies and practices.

Global humanitarian aid Health policy Non-governmental organizations Pharmaceutical donation policies Pharmaceutical industry World Health Organization

Journal

Globalization and health
ISSN: 1744-8603
Titre abrégé: Global Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101245734

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2023
Historique:
received: 10 03 2023
accepted: 18 08 2023
medline: 4 9 2023
pubmed: 2 9 2023
entrez: 1 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To help promote the effective delivery of drug donations, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Guidelines for Medicine Donations. The need for revisions is timely given the large-scale influx of medicine donations since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyses current policies of donors and recipients that are commensurate with the recommendations in the Guidelines and examines current practices, challenges, and revision suggestions. A search for medicine donation policies of donors and recipients was conducted in May/June 2022 and repeated in January 2023. Potential donor countries were identified from the high-income countries on the United Nation's (UN) List of G20 Countries. Potential pharmaceutical company donors were selected from those with 2021 revenue of $30 billion or greater. Potential non-government organization donors came from the WHO list of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and two other sources. Potential recipient countries were those on the UN List of Least Developed Countries. These four lists were supplemented with actual donors and recipients identified from the literature. All policies retrieved were screened to identify which of the 12 recommendations from the WHO Guidelines were incorporated. We identified 38 policies from 1 donor country, 6 brand-name multinational pharmaceutical companies, 6 NGOs and 25 recipient countries. Most policies incorporated all 12 recommendations. Twenty-five of the 38 policies were developed in 2010 or later. The majority of actual donors and recipients did not have policies that were publicly available. A rapid literature review for publications from 2010 onwards identified challenges in implementing the WHO Guidelines and suggested for revisions. Challenges included: (1) information management; (2) medication presentation; (3) influence from the pharmaceutical industry; (4) donation sustainability; and (5) the belief that donations are inherently good. Our findings suggest that both donors and recipients could further align their policies with the existing Guidelines and both groups should be consulted on any revisions to ensure that their experiences are reflected and their needs are addressed. While the current WHO Guidelines for Medicine Donations are a solid base for medical humanitarian efforts, evidence points to the need for an update to meet current challenges.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
To help promote the effective delivery of drug donations, the World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Guidelines for Medicine Donations. The need for revisions is timely given the large-scale influx of medicine donations since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyses current policies of donors and recipients that are commensurate with the recommendations in the Guidelines and examines current practices, challenges, and revision suggestions.
RESULTS
A search for medicine donation policies of donors and recipients was conducted in May/June 2022 and repeated in January 2023. Potential donor countries were identified from the high-income countries on the United Nation's (UN) List of G20 Countries. Potential pharmaceutical company donors were selected from those with 2021 revenue of $30 billion or greater. Potential non-government organization donors came from the WHO list of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and two other sources. Potential recipient countries were those on the UN List of Least Developed Countries. These four lists were supplemented with actual donors and recipients identified from the literature. All policies retrieved were screened to identify which of the 12 recommendations from the WHO Guidelines were incorporated. We identified 38 policies from 1 donor country, 6 brand-name multinational pharmaceutical companies, 6 NGOs and 25 recipient countries. Most policies incorporated all 12 recommendations. Twenty-five of the 38 policies were developed in 2010 or later. The majority of actual donors and recipients did not have policies that were publicly available. A rapid literature review for publications from 2010 onwards identified challenges in implementing the WHO Guidelines and suggested for revisions. Challenges included: (1) information management; (2) medication presentation; (3) influence from the pharmaceutical industry; (4) donation sustainability; and (5) the belief that donations are inherently good.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that both donors and recipients could further align their policies with the existing Guidelines and both groups should be consulted on any revisions to ensure that their experiences are reflected and their needs are addressed. While the current WHO Guidelines for Medicine Donations are a solid base for medical humanitarian efforts, evidence points to the need for an update to meet current challenges.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37658389
doi: 10.1186/s12992-023-00964-3
pii: 10.1186/s12992-023-00964-3
pmc: PMC10474724
doi:

Types de publication

Review Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

67

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

J Pharm Policy Pract. 2015 Oct 19;8:28
pubmed: 26525948
Int Health. 2018 Mar 1;10(2):133-136
pubmed: 29401248
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2020 Nov 23;1:100060
pubmed: 36101692
Int Health. 2019 Sep 2;11(5):379-402
pubmed: 30916303
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2011 Jan;9(1):1-5
pubmed: 21130039
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Dec 1;88(12):922-9
pubmed: 21124717

Auteurs

Hannah Permaul Flores (H)

WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Jillian C Kohler (JC)

WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. jillian.kohler@utoronto.ca.
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. jillian.kohler@utoronto.ca.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. jillian.kohler@utoronto.ca.
Munk School of Global Affairs and Public Policy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. jillian.kohler@utoronto.ca.

Deirdre Dimancesco (D)

Department of Health Products Policy and Standards, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Anna Wong (A)

WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto Faculty of Law, Toronto, Canada.

Joel Lexchin (J)

WHO Collaborating Centre for Governance, Accountability and Transparency in the Pharmaceutical Sector, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Department of Health, York University, Toronto, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH