Comparison of the acceptable surface limits derived from the skin sensitization potency for workers and swab residue limits determined from the permitted daily exposure derived from the systemic effects.
Acceptable surface limits
HBEL
LLNA: BrdU-ELISA
Skin sensitization
Journal
The Journal of toxicological sciences
ISSN: 1880-3989
Titre abrégé: J Toxicol Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 7805798
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
medline:
5
9
2023
pubmed:
4
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Allergic contact dermatitis is a common occupational and environmental health problem and setting of health-based exposure limits (HBELs) to prevent induction of skin sensitization is strongly desired. When manufacturing pharmaceuticals in a shared facility, cleaning validation using surface residue levels (SRLs) derived from permitted daily exposures (PDEs) is conducted to avoid cross-contamination from the perspective of protecting patients; however, it is unclear whether the SRLs are sufficient to prevent induction of skin sensitization for workers as well. In this study, we compared acceptable surface limits (ASLs) derived from acceptable exposure levels (AELs) based on EC1.6 obtained from local lymph node assay (LLNA): BrdU-ELISA for occupational risk management of skin sensitizers with PDE-based SRLs. ASLs for 1,4-phenylenediamine (GHS skin sensitization sub-category 1A), isoeugenol (sub-category 1A), and methyl methacrylate (sub-category 1B) were compared with SRLs based on the PDEs derived from their systemic effects. The results yielded an SRL for 1,4-phenylenediamine (PDE: 0.8 mg/day) of 30 mg/100 cm
Substances chimiques
4-phenylenediamine
U770QIT64J
diethylstilbestrol monophosphate
47341-71-9
isoeugenol
5M0MWY797U
Methylmethacrylate
196OC77688
Methacrylates
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM