Influence of self-perceived disability on squatting kinematics in individuals with patellofemoral pain.
Anterior knee pain
Biomechanics
Motion analysis
Journal
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
received:
14
06
2023
revised:
15
08
2023
accepted:
29
08
2023
medline:
2
10
2023
pubmed:
5
9
2023
entrez:
4
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Individuals with patellofemoral pain have a heterogeneous presentation of symptoms during functional tasks; however, biomechanical data often negates self-reported disability. The single leg squat is common in patellofemoral pain literature but may not be a pain provoking task for all individuals. Therefore, our study examined the influence of self-perceived squatting disability in individuals with patellofemoral pain on lower extremity squatting kinematics. We analyzed two-dimensional hip frontal plane projection angle, knee frontal plane projection angle, lateral trunk movement, and pelvic drop in 100 participants, 82 with patellofemoral pain and 18 pain-free controls. Participants with patellofemoral pain were dichotomized based on the level of disability reported during squatting on the anterior knee pain scale. An analysis of variance with post hoc testing was used to compare differences in lower extremity and trunk kinematics between groups, p < 0.05. Participants who reported only being able to squat with partial weight bearing had greater hip frontal plane projection angles than those who reported squatting painful each time (p = 0.017). The partial weight bearing group had greater knee frontal plane projection angles compared those who reported pain with repeated squatting and the pain-free group, (p < 0.034). We found no significant differences in lateral trunk motion or pelvic drop between groups. Individuals with patellofemoral pain who self-reported worse squatting disability had greater hip and knee frontal plane motion compared to individuals with less disability and pain-free controls. Clinicians and researchers should consider specific pain provoking tasks when evaluating and treating patients with patellofemoral pain.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Individuals with patellofemoral pain have a heterogeneous presentation of symptoms during functional tasks; however, biomechanical data often negates self-reported disability. The single leg squat is common in patellofemoral pain literature but may not be a pain provoking task for all individuals. Therefore, our study examined the influence of self-perceived squatting disability in individuals with patellofemoral pain on lower extremity squatting kinematics.
METHODS
We analyzed two-dimensional hip frontal plane projection angle, knee frontal plane projection angle, lateral trunk movement, and pelvic drop in 100 participants, 82 with patellofemoral pain and 18 pain-free controls. Participants with patellofemoral pain were dichotomized based on the level of disability reported during squatting on the anterior knee pain scale. An analysis of variance with post hoc testing was used to compare differences in lower extremity and trunk kinematics between groups, p < 0.05.
FINDINGS
Participants who reported only being able to squat with partial weight bearing had greater hip frontal plane projection angles than those who reported squatting painful each time (p = 0.017). The partial weight bearing group had greater knee frontal plane projection angles compared those who reported pain with repeated squatting and the pain-free group, (p < 0.034). We found no significant differences in lateral trunk motion or pelvic drop between groups.
INTERPRETATION
Individuals with patellofemoral pain who self-reported worse squatting disability had greater hip and knee frontal plane motion compared to individuals with less disability and pain-free controls. Clinicians and researchers should consider specific pain provoking tasks when evaluating and treating patients with patellofemoral pain.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37666039
pii: S0268-0033(23)00220-6
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106089
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106089Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest A portion of this work was supported by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs through the Peer Reviewed Orthopaedic Research Program under Award No. (W81XWH-22-1-0532). Opinions, interpretations, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Department of Defense. The funding source did not have any role in its execution, analyses, interpretation of data or decision to submit results. The authors have no other conflicts of interest with this work.