Interaction of biomolecules with anatase, rutile and amorphous TiO2 surfaces: A molecular dynamics study.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 14 02 2023
accepted: 19 07 2023
medline: 7 9 2023
pubmed: 5 9 2023
entrez: 5 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The adhesion of biomolecules to dental and orthopedic implants is a fundamental step in the process of osseointegration. Short peptide motifs, such as RGD or KRSR, carried by extracellular matrix proteins or coated onto implant surfaces, accelerate cell adhesion and tissue formation. For this reason, understanding the binding mechanisms of adhesive peptides to oxidized surfaces of titanium implants is of paramount importance. We performed molecular dynamics simulations to compare the adhesion properties of 6 peptides, including the tripeptide RGD, its variants KGD and LGD, as well as the tetrapeptide KRSR, its variant LRSR and its truncated version RSR, on anatase, rutile, and amorphous titanium dioxide (TiO2) surfaces. The migration of these molecules from the water phase to the surface was simulated in an aqueous environment. Based on these simulations, we calculated the residence time of each peptide bound to the three different TiO2 structures. It was found that the presence of an N-terminal lysine or arginine amino acid residue resulted in more efficient surface binding. A pulling simulation was performed to detach the adhered molecules. The maximum pulling force and the binding energy were determined from the results of these simulations. The tri- and tetrapeptides had slightly greater adhesion affinity to the amorphous and anatase structure than to rutile in general, however specific surface and peptide binding characters could be detected. The binding energies obtained from our simulations allowed us to rank the adhesion strengths of the studied peptides.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37669294
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289467
pii: PONE-D-23-04372
pmc: PMC10479902
doi:

Substances chimiques

titanium dioxide 15FIX9V2JP
Titanium D1JT611TNE
Amino Acids 0
Oligopeptides 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0289467

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Tarjányi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1701-18
pubmed: 16211538
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Dec;14(6):839-51
pubmed: 22897683
Bioinformatics. 2013 Apr 1;29(7):845-54
pubmed: 23407358
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 24;6:37761
pubmed: 27883086
J Phys Chem B. 1998 Apr 30;102(18):3586-616
pubmed: 24889800
J Mol Model. 2011 Jun;17(6):1467-72
pubmed: 20853182
Int J Biomater. 2010;2010:915327
pubmed: 21253543
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Mar 1;80(3):602-11
pubmed: 17031820
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013 Apr 14;15(14):4844-58
pubmed: 23450160
J Comput Chem. 2011 Jan 15;32(1):174-82
pubmed: 20607691
Nat Methods. 2017 Jan;14(1):71-73
pubmed: 27819658
J Chem Phys. 2015 Jun 21;142(23):234102
pubmed: 26093545
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2908570
pubmed: 26885506
J Biomed Mater Res. 1998 Jun 5;40(3):371-7
pubmed: 9570067
J Phys Chem B. 2010 Apr 8;114(13):4692-701
pubmed: 20235568
J Chem Theory Comput. 2008 Mar;4(3):435-47
pubmed: 26620784
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 21;20(6):
pubmed: 30901841
Biomacromolecules. 2005 Nov-Dec;6(6):3345-50
pubmed: 16283764
Anaerobe. 2021 Aug;70:102404
pubmed: 34146701
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008 Nov;19(11):3437-41
pubmed: 18584123
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011 Feb;96(2):466-76
pubmed: 21171166
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Dec 09;22(24):
pubmed: 34948048
Biomark Res. 2016 Dec 14;4:24
pubmed: 27999672
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Feb 23;10(2):
pubmed: 32102185
Biomaterials. 2006 Nov;27(32):5561-71
pubmed: 16879866
Comput Biol Chem. 2020 Jun;86:107236
pubmed: 32220810

Auteurs

Tamás Tarjányi (T)

Department of Oral Biology and Experimental Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Ferenc Bogár (F)

EKLH-SZTE Biomimetic Systems Research Group, Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH), University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

János Minárovits (J)

Department of Oral Biology and Experimental Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Márió Gajdács (M)

Department of Oral Biology and Experimental Dental Research, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Zsolt Tóth (Z)

Department of Medical Physics and Medical Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Fucosyltransferases Drug Repositioning Molecular Docking Simulation Molecular Dynamics Simulation Humans
Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 Ligands Molecular Dynamics Simulation Protein Binding Thermodynamics

Amyloid accelerator polyphosphate fits as the mystery density in α-synuclein fibrils.

Philipp Huettemann, Pavithra Mahadevan, Justine Lempart et al.
1.00
Polyphosphates alpha-Synuclein Humans Amyloid Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Classifications MeSH