Pectoralis major and triceps brachii cross-sectional area measured on different planes: the effect on the muscle size-strength relationship.


Journal

The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness
ISSN: 1827-1928
Titre abrégé: J Sports Med Phys Fitness
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0376337

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline: 27 10 2023
pubmed: 7 9 2023
entrez: 7 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well-used technique to assess muscle size and can be acquired on different planes. Pectoralis major (PM) and triceps brachii (TB) muscles are often acquired and analyzed on the axial plane, however it is unknown if anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) calculated from different planes will affect the muscle size-strength relationship. Thus, the first aim of the present study was to identify if the CSA of the PM and TB measured on different planes presents a similar muscle size-strength relationship. A secondary aim was to investigate if the quantification of CSA of the PM and TB muscles are similar between sagittal and axial plane. Fifteen males underwent an MRI examination, and after that, one-repetition maximum (1RM) test was performed. There was a significant relationship between 1RM and PM CSA measured on the axial and sagittal plane (r≤0.81), while the relationship with TB CSA was only good on the axial plane (r=0.65) and not significant on the sagittal plane (r=0.27). ICC between planes was excellent for PM CSA (0.96) with Bland-Altman procedure showing agreement between planes (d=0.376; P=0.612). Contrarily, TB CSA ICC was week (0.07), with Bland-Altman procedure showing no agreement between planes (d=-24.49; P=0.022). CSA measured at axial plane from PM and TB muscles showed a significant relationship with 1RM, while only PM CSA on the sagittal plane showed a significant relationship with 1RM. Finally, it was demonstrated that PM images showed a great reliability between planes, which was not true for TB muscle.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a well-used technique to assess muscle size and can be acquired on different planes. Pectoralis major (PM) and triceps brachii (TB) muscles are often acquired and analyzed on the axial plane, however it is unknown if anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA) calculated from different planes will affect the muscle size-strength relationship. Thus, the first aim of the present study was to identify if the CSA of the PM and TB measured on different planes presents a similar muscle size-strength relationship. A secondary aim was to investigate if the quantification of CSA of the PM and TB muscles are similar between sagittal and axial plane.
METHODS METHODS
Fifteen males underwent an MRI examination, and after that, one-repetition maximum (1RM) test was performed.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was a significant relationship between 1RM and PM CSA measured on the axial and sagittal plane (r≤0.81), while the relationship with TB CSA was only good on the axial plane (r=0.65) and not significant on the sagittal plane (r=0.27). ICC between planes was excellent for PM CSA (0.96) with Bland-Altman procedure showing agreement between planes (d=0.376; P=0.612). Contrarily, TB CSA ICC was week (0.07), with Bland-Altman procedure showing no agreement between planes (d=-24.49; P=0.022).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
CSA measured at axial plane from PM and TB muscles showed a significant relationship with 1RM, while only PM CSA on the sagittal plane showed a significant relationship with 1RM. Finally, it was demonstrated that PM images showed a great reliability between planes, which was not true for TB muscle.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37675501
pii: S0022-4707.23.15090-0
doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.23.15090-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1194-1201

Auteurs

Marcel B Lanza (MB)

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Hugo C Martins-Costa (HC)

Weight Training Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil - hugocmc@gmail.com.
Department of Physical Education, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Aler R de Almeida (AR)

Department of Physical Education, Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Carolina C de Souza (CC)

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Rodrigo Cr Diniz (RC)

Weight Training Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Fernando V Lima (FV)

Weight Training Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

André Gp Andrade (AG)

Weight Training Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Mauro H Chagas (MH)

Weight Training Laboratory, School of Physical Education, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH