Cervical preparation for second-trimester procedural abortion.


Journal

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology
ISSN: 1473-656X
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007264

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2023
Historique:
medline: 3 11 2023
pubmed: 8 9 2023
entrez: 7 9 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To review the evidence-informed options for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester dilation and evacuation (D&E). As abortion restrictions increase and the number of abortion clinics and providers decreases, pregnant people are facing more barriers to abortion access. Those in need are now often required to travel for second-trimester abortion care, only to be faced with additional restrictions, such as mandatory waiting periods. Cervical preparation is recommended prior to D&E and takes time for effect. Given the increasing time required to obtain an abortion, patients and providers may prefer same-day cervical preparation to decrease the total time required. Options for same-day cervical preparation include misoprostol alone with single or serial doses, and misoprostol combined with osmotic dilators or transcervical balloon (Foley catheter). Same-day preparation may require additional clinical space to accommodate people after initiation of cervical preparation to manage side-effects and timing of the abortion. Overnight options are also used and more frequently later in the second trimester. Overnight options include mifepristone, osmotic dilators, and transcervical balloon and are often combined with same-day misoprostol. Medication alone preparation is well tolerated and effective in the second trimester, with the addition of mechanical methods with advancing gestation. With many options and combinations being safe and effective, providers can be dynamic and alter approach with supply shortages, adjust to different clinical settings, consider patient medical and surgical factors, and accommodate provider and patient preferences. Multiple pharmacologic and mechanical options have been shown to be safe and effective for cervical preparation prior to D&E. Consideration for multiple factors should influence the method of cervical preparation and methods may vary by patient, provider and setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37678155
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000912
pii: 00001703-990000000-00092
doi:

Substances chimiques

Misoprostol 0E43V0BB57
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal 0
Mifepristone 320T6RNW1F

Types de publication

Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

470-475

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Kortsmit K, Jatlaoui TC, Mandel MG, et al. Abortion surveillance - United States, 2018. MMWR Surveill Summ 2020; 69:1–29.
Nash E, Ephross P. State Policy Trends 2022: In a Devastating Year, US Supreme Court's Decision to Overturn Roe Leads to Bans, Confusion and Chaos [Internet]. Guttmacher Institute. First published online: December 19, 2022. Available from: https://www.guttmacher.org/2022/12/statepolicy-trends-2022-devastating-year-us-supreme-courts-decision-overturn-roe-leads [Accessed 23 August 2023]
Vinekar K, Karlapudi A, Nathan L, et al. Projected implications of overturning Roe v Wade on abortion training in U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140:146–149.
ACOG.org. ACOG Statement on the Decision in Dobbs V. Jackson. [Internet] First published online: June 24, 2022. Available at: https://www.acog.org/news/news-releases/2022/06/acog-statement-on-the-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson [Accessed 23 August 2023]
Jerman J, Jones RK, Onda T. Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients in 2014 and changes since 2008 [Internet] Guttmacher Institute. First published online: May 2016. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/report/characteristics-us-abortion-patients-2014 [Accessed 23 August 2023]
Diedrich JT, Drey EA, Newmann SJ. Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 20-24 weeks’ gestation. Contraception 2020; 101:286–292.
Tang OS, Gemzell-Danielsson K, Ho PC. Misoprostol: pharmacokinetic profiles, effects on the uterus and side-effects. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007; 99: (Suppl 2): S160–S167.
Edelman AB, Buckmaster JG, Goetsch MF, et al. Cervical preparation using laminaria with adjunctive buccal misoprostol before second-trimester dilation and evacuation procedures: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194:425–430.
Shaw KA, Shaw JG, Hugin M, et al. Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial. Contraception 2015; 91:313–319.
Shaw KA, Lerma K, Shaw JG, et al. Preoperative effects of mifepristone for dilation and evacuation after 19 weeks of gestation: a randomised controlled trial. Bjog 2017; 124:1973–1981.
Goldberg AB, Fortin JA, Drey EA, et al. Cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation using adjunctive misoprostol or mifepristone compared with overnight osmotic dilators alone: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126:599–609.
Drey EA, Benson LS, Sokoloff A, et al. Buccal misoprostol plus laminaria for cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 21-23 weeks of gestation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2014; 89:307–313.
Ngo LL, Mokashi M, Janiak E, et al. Acute complications with same-day versus overnight cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 14 to 16 weeks. Contraception 2023; 117:61–66.
MacIsaac L, Grossman D, Balistreri E, Darney P. A randomized controlled trial of laminaria, oral misoprostol, and vaginal misoprostol before abortion. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93 (5 Pt 1):766–770.
Ramesh S, Roston A, Zimmerman L, et al. Misoprostol 1 to 3 h preprocedure vs. overnight osmotic dilators prior to early second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception 2015; 92:234–240.
Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks’ gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception 2014; 89:75–84.
Maurer KA, Jacobson JC, Turok DK. Same-day cervical preparation with misoprostol prior to second trimester D&E: a case series. Contraception 2013; 88:116–121.
Robbins A, Spitz IM. Mifepristone: clinical pharmacology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1996; 39:436–450.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology, Society of Family Planning. Medication Abortion Up to 70 Days of Gestation: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 225. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136:e31–e47.
FDA. Questions and Answers: Mifepristone Medical Termination of Pregnancy Through Ten Weeks Gestation. FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/postmarket-drug-safety-information-patients-and-providers/questions-and-answers-mifepristone-medical-termination-pregnancy-through-ten-weeks-gestation2021
Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, et al. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception 2012; 86:567–571.
Paris AE, Vragovic O, Sonalkar S, et al. Mifepristone and misoprostol compared to osmotic dilators for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 15-18 weeks’ gestation: a randomised controlled noninferiority trial. BMJ Sex Reprod Health 2019; 21:2019–200367.
Hern WM. Laminaria, induced fetal demise and misoprostol in late abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2001; 75:279–286.
Fine PM. Ulipristal acetate: a new emergency contraceptive that is safe and more effective than levonorgestrel. Womens Health (Lond) 2011; 7:9–17.
Peterson SF, Lerma K, Shaw KA, Blumenthal PD. Cervical preparation using ulipristal acetate with adjunct misoprostol in second-trimester surgical abortions. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 907–909.
Henkel A, Blumenthal PD. Second-trimester abortion care for those with complex medical conditions. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 34:359–366.
White KO, Jones HE, Shorter J, et al. Second-trimester surgical abortion practices in the United States. Contraception 2018; S0010-7824(18)30140-9.
Liu SM, Shaw KA. Pain management in outpatient surgical abortion. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33:440–444.
Boraas CM, Achilles SL, Cremer ML, et al. Synthetic osmotic dilators with adjunctive misoprostol for same-day dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2016; 94:467–472.
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114 (2 Pt 1):386–397.
Hackett GA, Reginald P, Paintin DB. Comparison of the Foley catheter and dinoprostone pessary for cervical preparation before second trimester abortion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96:1432–1434.
Chandrasekaran S, Paul M, Ruggiero S, et al. Foley catheter and misoprostol for cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception 2021; 104:437–441.
Sium AF, Prager S, Wolderufael M, et al. Foley catheter for cervical preparation prior to second trimester dilation and evacuation: a supply-based alternative for surgical abortion: A case series. Contracept X 2022; 4:100085.

Auteurs

Farsam Fraz (F)

Division of Gynecology and Gynecologic Specialities, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH