Approaches to the development of new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples: A systematic mixed studies review.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
07
03
2023
accepted:
08
08
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
8
9
2023
entrez:
8
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This mixed studies review assessed the extent of the literature related to approaches used to develop new tools that screen for distress in Indigenous adults globally. It answered the research question: What qualitative and quantitative approaches are used to develop new screening tools that assess distress in Indigenous peoples globally? CINAHL, Embase, Emcare, Medline, PsychInfo and Scopus databases were systematically searched to identify relevant articles published between January 2000 and February 2023. Articles describing the development of a new screening tool for Indigenous peoples, globally, published in English since 2000 and constituted a full publication of primary research, met the inclusion criteria. Studies underwent quality appraisal using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool. A sequential exploratory design guided data analysis. Synthesis occurred using a two-phase sequential method. Nineteen articles constituted the data set. Articles described the use of qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods in approximately equal numbers. Overall, qualitative methods were used in early stages of tool development, with mixed and quantitative methods used to pilot and validate them. However, most studies did not follow the theoretical guidelines for tool development, and while validation studies took place in over half of the data set, none adequately assessed construct validity. Sixty percent of the articles were located using citation searches, which suggests database searches were ineffective. Valid tools that screen for distress in Indigenous populations support equitable access to health care. This review found that most screening tools were developed in Australia. However, additional evidence of their validity is needed in addition to a valid diagnostic tool that supports the determination of criterion validity. These needs present important future research opportunities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37682832
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291141
pii: PONE-D-23-06625
pmc: PMC10490875
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0291141Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Meldrum et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Oct;18(5):377-82
pubmed: 16951425
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):1270
pubmed: 31533670
J Couns Psychol. 2021 Apr;68(3):259-270
pubmed: 34043373
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307
pubmed: 29209603
Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13(5):R152
pubmed: 21933393
Australas Psychiatry. 2015 Jun;23(3):287-92
pubmed: 25944764
J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Jan;84:137-152
pubmed: 27741502
Aust J Rural Health. 2008 Jun;16(3):124-31
pubmed: 18471181
Contemp Nurse. 2016 Feb;52(1):42-58
pubmed: 27294330
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Oct 20;13:271
pubmed: 24139186
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 25;:13634615231187257
pubmed: 37490720
Australas Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;25(3):288-289
pubmed: 28347145
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Mar;26(2):109-17
pubmed: 17364845
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Apr;17(2):268-74
pubmed: 20874835
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;187:174-183
pubmed: 28704701
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;51(2):211-23
pubmed: 26233468
Ann Public Health Res. 2016;3(1):
pubmed: 28553671
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 28;18(11):
pubmed: 34071636
Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49
pubmed: 20169472
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;57(2):283-290
pubmed: 36688275
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1695-1710
pubmed: 29464456
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0156939
pubmed: 27310297
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Oct;57(10):2131-2145
pubmed: 34398264
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 May;49(5):412-29
pubmed: 25690747
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91
pubmed: 11124735
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;44(9):791-9
pubmed: 20815665
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Aug;32(4):317-21
pubmed: 18782392
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Aug;187:164-173
pubmed: 28689090
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2018 Dec;77(1):1481325
pubmed: 29869591
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:29-45
pubmed: 24188053
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007 Jun;31(3):259-63
pubmed: 17679245
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
Med J Aust. 2019 Jul;211(1):24-30
pubmed: 31256439
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Nov;56(11):1129-35
pubmed: 14615004
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 12;15(6):e0234346
pubmed: 32530934
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 01;16(21):
pubmed: 31683908
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Mar;41(1):88-96
pubmed: 34351674
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 30;12(1):e0168969
pubmed: 28135275
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149
pubmed: 29942800
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 10;21(1):1111
pubmed: 34112127
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 09;12:176
pubmed: 25492701
Clin Gerontol. 2023 Mar-Apr;46(2):240-252
pubmed: 35694996
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;52(2):111-20
pubmed: 17375867
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e94983
pubmed: 24740098
Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 23;6(1):61
pubmed: 28335799
Qual Life Res. 2012 May;21(4):659-70
pubmed: 21735306
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 16;12(8):e063710
pubmed: 35973708