Simulating dispersion of oils from a subsea release comparing mechanical and chemically enhanced dispersion - An experimental study of the influence of oil properties.
Dispersants
Dispersion
Mechanical
Oil droplets
Oil spill
Response
Subsea
Technology
Journal
Marine pollution bulletin
ISSN: 1879-3363
Titre abrégé: Mar Pollut Bull
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0260231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
26
06
2023
revised:
20
08
2023
accepted:
30
08
2023
medline:
10
10
2023
pubmed:
8
9
2023
entrez:
8
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The main objective with subsea mechanical dispersion (SSMD) is to influence the fate of an oil spill in the marine environment by significantly reducing oil droplet sizes from subsea release of oil. Earlier studies have indicated that the capability of SSMD to reduce oil droplet sizes is comparable to subsea dispersant injection (SSDI). Earlier testing of SSMD has mainly used a low viscus paraffinic oil. Focus for this study was to study SSMD and SSDI effectiveness using five oil types spanning out a wide variation of relevant oil properties. Effectiveness was quantified as the reduction in oil droplet sizes measured by a Silhouette camera. Testing of the two technologies were completed in the same experiment on a simulated subsea release. The results show a variation in effectiveness for both technologies as a function of oil properties. SSMD and SSDI showed comparable effectiveness for all oils tested.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37683392
pii: S0025-326X(23)00913-X
doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115479
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Oils
0
Water Pollutants, Chemical
0
Petroleum
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
115479Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: The first author (Brandvik) has an Adjunct Professor position at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU). This is a 20 % position financed by a cooperation between NTNU and a major energy company in Norway (Equinor AS). The program is called Akademia-avtalen. However, this cooperation does not give the industry any influence on candidates holding the adjunct position funded by the program. They are employed by NTNU through an ordinary announcement/evaluation process. The industry has also no influence on the academic activity or production of the adjunct professors.