Predicting sepsis using a combination of clinical information and molecular immune markers sampled in the ambulance.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 09 2023
10 09 2023
Historique:
received:
16
06
2023
accepted:
05
09
2023
medline:
12
9
2023
pubmed:
11
9
2023
entrez:
10
9
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sepsis is a time dependent condition. Screening tools based on clinical parameters have been shown to increase the identification of sepsis. The aim of current study was to evaluate the additional predictive value of immunological molecular markers to our previously developed prehospital screening tools. This is a prospective cohort study of 551 adult patients with suspected infection in the ambulance setting of Stockholm, Sweden between 2017 and 2018. Initially, 74 molecules and 15 genes related to inflammation were evaluated in a screening cohort of 46 patients with outcome sepsis and 50 patients with outcome infection no sepsis. Next, 12 selected molecules, as potentially synergistic predictors, were evaluated in combination with our previously developed screening tools based on clinical parameters in a prediction cohort (n = 455). Seven different algorithms with nested cross-validation were used in the machine learning of the prediction models. Model performances were compared using posterior distributions of average area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and difference in AUCs. Model variable importance was assessed by permutation of variable values, scoring loss of classification as metric and with model-specific weights when applicable. When comparing the screening tools with and without added molecular variables, and their interactions, the molecules per se did not increase the predictive values. Prediction models based on the molecular variables alone showed a performance in terms of AUCs between 0.65 and 0.70. Among the molecular variables, IL-1Ra, IL-17A, CCL19, CX3CL1 and TNF were significantly higher in septic patients compared to the infection non-sepsis group. Combing immunological molecular markers with clinical parameters did not increase the predictive values of the screening tools, most likely due to the high multicollinearity of temperature and some of the markers. A group of sepsis patients was consistently miss-classified in our prediction models, due to milder symptoms as well as lower expression levels of the investigated immune mediators. This indicates a need of stratifying septic patients with a priori knowledge of certain clinical and molecular parameters in order to improve prediction for early sepsis diagnosis.Trial registration: NCT03249597. Registered 15 August 2017.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37691028
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42081-6
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-42081-6
pmc: PMC10493220
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03249597']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14917Informations de copyright
© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2027-2029
pubmed: 27815587
Eur J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(4):260-5
pubmed: 24080997
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198686
pubmed: 31390038
Crit Care. 2020 May 19;24(1):239
pubmed: 32430052
Resuscitation. 2010 Feb;81(2):193-7
pubmed: 20006419
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 25;28(1):59
pubmed: 32586337
Lancet. 2020 Jan 18;395(10219):200-211
pubmed: 31954465
J Infect. 2021 May;82(5):125-134
pubmed: 33722641
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225700
pubmed: 31805110
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11
pubmed: 25776532
Resuscitation. 2015 May;90:111-5
pubmed: 25748878
Biomedicines. 2020 Nov 12;8(11):
pubmed: 33198109
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2016 Jun;31(3):272-7
pubmed: 27026077
Lancet Infect Dis. 2013 Mar;13(3):260-8
pubmed: 23427891
Nat Commun. 2018 Feb 15;9(1):694
pubmed: 29449546
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 13;26(1):19
pubmed: 35027073
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;30(1):51-6
pubmed: 21030181
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 May;35(5):e23753
pubmed: 33704828
Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Apr;40(7):e51
pubmed: 22228834
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 7;7(1):10800
pubmed: 28883645
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 8;3(4):ofw207
pubmed: 27942538
Dis Markers. 2019 Sep 8;2019:1089107
pubmed: 31583025
Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R15
pubmed: 20144219
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 05;6(8):e011218
pubmed: 27496231
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244
pubmed: 28528569
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):915-925
pubmed: 29537985
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 6;26(1):14
pubmed: 34991675
JAMA. 2019 May 28;321(20):2003-2017
pubmed: 31104070
Surgery. 2018 Feb;163(2):409-414
pubmed: 29129362
Cytokine. 2019 Aug;120:227-233
pubmed: 31125901
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):325-30
pubmed: 21524204
Braz J Infect Dis. 2019 Mar - Apr;23(2):79-85
pubmed: 31112675
Lancet Respir Med. 2016 Apr;4(4):259-71
pubmed: 26917434
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):14-8
pubmed: 25951678
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 5;24(1):287
pubmed: 32503670
Lung. 2020 Aug;198(4):687-693
pubmed: 32462370
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Jan 06;24:1
pubmed: 26733395