Physician Assistant Faculty Perceptions Regarding Ongoing Self-assessment and Accreditation.
Journal
The journal of physician assistant education : the official journal of the Physician Assistant Education Association
ISSN: 1941-9449
Titre abrégé: J Physician Assist Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101298201
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2023
01 Dec 2023
Historique:
medline:
20
11
2023
pubmed:
12
9
2023
entrez:
12
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
While the processes of ongoing self-assessment and accreditation provide significant benefits to physician assistant (PA) programs, faculty members are often challenged by the required procedures and standards set by accreditation agencies. This study explored faculty perspectives regarding the processes of ongoing self-assessment and accreditation in PA programs. A qualitative research design centered around semistructured interviews was used. A total of 26 participants were recruited, including PA program directors, associate program directors, directors of assessment and accreditation, past Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant commissioners, accreditation consultants, deans, and PA Education Association leaders. Semistructured one-on-one interviews were conducted by 8 members of the research team through Zoom video conferencing. Data were collected until saturation was reached. The interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed independently by 3 researchers. The transcripts were imported into NVivo, a qualitative data analysis software, for coding and inductive thematic analysis. Six emergent themes were identified under 2 major categories: facilitators and challenges. Facilitators for conducting continuous programmatic review and analysis include it takes a village, internal and external support, and sustained faculty development, whereas challenges are lack of knowledge and time, unclear expectations, and inflexibility. The study highlights factors associated with facilitating the ongoing self-assessment process. However, a number of challenges were also identified. The study suggests opportunities for intervention at the program, institution, and profession level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37698942
doi: 10.1097/JPA.0000000000000554
pii: 01367895-990000000-00099
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
271-277Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 PA Education Association.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Exploring the Role of Accreditation in Enhancing Quality and Innovation in Health Professions Education: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017.
Miles M, Frias N. Preliminary Accreditation. Analysis. Physician Assistant Education Association; 2021.
Kayingo G, Gordes KL, Kulo V, Cawley JF. Accreditation in the health professions: implications for physician assistant education. J Physician Assist Educ. 2022;33(4):318-324.
Snyder J, Skala T. Citation and characteristic analysis of physician assistant programs placed on accreditation–probation, 2015-2017. J Physician Assist Educ. 2018;29(4):211-219.
Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant. Accreditation Committee/Commission History Timeline. https://www.arc-pa.org/about/arc-pa-history/ . Accessed September 26, 2022.
Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant. Accredited programs. https://www.arc-pa.org/accreditation/accredited-programs/ . Accessed September 26, 2022.
Creswell JW, Poth CN. Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2018.
Saldaña J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2021.
O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245-1251.
Graham-Burnet K. Why we left: a qualitative investigation of former physician assistant faculty. J Physician Assist Educ. 2023;34(2):104-109.
Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant. Accreditation Standards for Physician Assistant Education. 5th ed. Clarification 9/2022. https://www.arc-pa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Standards-5th-Ed-September-2022.pdf . Accessed September 26, 2022.
Assistant Education Association Physician. By the Numbers: Program Report 35: Data From the 2019 Program Survey. Washington, DC: PAEA; 2020.
Ziefle K, Koschmann K, Colsch R, Campbell J, Graeve C. Innovation and accreditation: a quality improvement process. Teach Learn Nurs. 2021;16(3):265-268.