Determining the relative salience of recognised push variables on health professional decisions to leave the UK National Health Service (NHS) using the method of paired comparisons.

change management health & safety health services administration & management occupational & industrial medicine organisation of health services statistics & research methods

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 09 2023
Historique:
medline: 14 9 2023
pubmed: 13 9 2023
entrez: 12 9 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The primary and secondary impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic are claimed to have had a detrimental impact on health professional retention within the UK National Health Service (NHS). This study set out to identify priorities for intervention by scaling the relative importance of widely cited push (leave) influences. During Summer/Autumn 2021, a UK-wide opportunity sample (n=1958) of NHS health professionals completed an online paired-comparisons exercise to determine the relative salience of work-related stress, workload intensity, time pressure, staffing levels, working hours, work-homelife balance, recognition of effort and pay as reasons why health professionals leave NHS employment. The study is believed to be the first large-scale systematic assessment of factors driving staff exits from the NHS since the COVID-19 pandemic. All professions gave primacy to work-related stress, workload intensity and staffing levels. Pay was typically located around the midpoint of the respective scales; recognition of effort and working hours were ranked lowest. However, differences were apparent in the rank order and relative weighting of push variables between health professions and care delivery functions. Ambulance paramedics present as an outlier, notably with respect to staffing level (F-stat 4.47, p=0.004) and the primacy of work-homelife balance. Relative to staffing level, other push variables exert a stronger influence on paramedics than nurses or doctors ( Findings are relevant to future NHS health professional retention intervention strategy. Excepting paramedics/ambulance services, rankings of leave variables across the different health professional families and organisation types exhibit strong alignment at the ordinal level. However, demographic differences in the weightings and rankings, ascribed to push factors by professional family and organisation type, suggests that, in addition to signposting universal (all-staff) priorities for intervention, bespoke solutions for different professions and functions may be needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37699606
pii: bmjopen-2022-070016
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070016
pmc: PMC10514647
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e070016

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Références

BMJ. 2022 Jan 5;376:n3139
pubmed: 34987050
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 5;11(7):e051326
pubmed: 34226238
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 21;10(7):e034919
pubmed: 32699127
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Mar;43(3):293-295
pubmed: 34586955
J Manag Med. 2002;16(4-5):271-91
pubmed: 12463644
Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2015 Mar;9(1):21-7
pubmed: 25829206
BMJ. 2015 Jul 17;351:h3901
pubmed: 26186928
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(1):20-32
pubmed: 29243348
Br J Nurs. 2019 Aug 8;28(15):1028-1029
pubmed: 31393769
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jan 07;8(1):e23
pubmed: 35043077
Lancet. 2021 May 22;397(10288):1992-2011
pubmed: 33965066
Nurs Stand. 2011 Sep 21-27;26(3):12-3
pubmed: 22003771
Health Econ. 2007 Jan;16(1):57-73
pubmed: 16929471
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 04;17(18):
pubmed: 32899897
Health Serv J. 2001 Feb 22;111(5743):suppl 11, 13
pubmed: 11256119
BMJ. 2021 Mar 12;372:n703
pubmed: 33712446
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2006 Feb;12(9):24-32
pubmed: 16475536
Health Serv Manage Res. 2004 Nov;17(4):249-62
pubmed: 15527540
BMJ. 2021 Oct 29;375:n2618
pubmed: 34716144
Psychol Trauma. 2022 Mar;14(3):516-521
pubmed: 34516222
Radiography (Lond). 2021 Aug;27(3):795-802
pubmed: 33423914
Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2014 Jun;4(6):421-9
pubmed: 25182941
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 08;4(4):e419
pubmed: 34646946
BMJ. 2018 Sep 20;362:k4001
pubmed: 30237202
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):E112-36
pubmed: 26174010
Cureus. 2022 Apr 1;14(4):e23730
pubmed: 35509733

Auteurs

Andrew Weyman (A)

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK A.Weyman@bath.ac.uk.

Rachel O'Hara (R)

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Peter Nolan (P)

School of Management, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Richard Glendinning (R)

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Deborah Roy (D)

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Joanne Coster (J)

School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH