Free-floating extracellular DNA (exDNA) in different wastewaters: Status quo on exDNA-associated antimicrobial resistance genes.
Horizontal gene transfer
One health
Pollution
Resistance development
Transformation
Wastewater treatment plants
Journal
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
ISSN: 1873-6424
Titre abrégé: Environ Pollut
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8804476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Nov 2023
15 Nov 2023
Historique:
received:
15
07
2023
revised:
28
08
2023
accepted:
13
09
2023
medline:
26
10
2023
pubmed:
17
9
2023
entrez:
16
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) have been reported as major anthropogenic reservoirs for the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) into the environment, worldwide. While most studies mainly focus on the intracellular DNA (iDNA), extracellular DNA (exDNA) accounting for a significant proportion of the total DNA in wastewater, was usually neglected. Following the One Health approach, this study focuses on wastewaters of municipal, clinical, and livestock origins (n = 45) that undergo different treatment processes (i.e., conventional activated sludge, ultrafiltration, and ozonation). Water samples were analysed for 12 ARGs as indicators of the different compartments associated with iDNA and exDNA by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Taxonomic profiling of exDNA-fractions, obtained using nucleic acid adsorption particles, was conducted by sequencing the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. Notified exDNA concentrations varied between on-site WWTPs and treatment stages, and ranged from 314.0 ± 70.2 ng/mL in untreated livestock wastewater down to 0.7 ± 0.1 ng/mL in effluents after ultrafiltration. In general, influents exhibited higher concentrations compared to effluents, while wastewater treated by advanced treatment processes (i.e., ultrafiltration and ozonation) showed the lowest exDNA concentrations. Despite the lower concentrations, free-floating exDNA accounted for up to 80.0 ± 5.8% of the total DNA in effluents. Target ARGs were more common in the iDNA (100%, n = 45/45), compared to the exDNA-fractions (51.1%, n = 23/45), whereas exDNA-ARGs were mostly detected in clinical and slaughterhouse wastewaters as well as in the municipal influents. Compared to the iDNA-ARGs, the concentrations of exDNA-ARGs were in general lower. Nevertheless, significant higher concentrations for exDNA-associated genes were measured in clinical wastewaters for bla
Identifiants
pubmed: 37716694
pii: S0269-7491(23)01562-2
doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122560
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Wastewater
0
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
0
DNA
9007-49-2
Ozone
66H7ZZK23N
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
122560Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests:Mykhailo Savin reports financial support and article publishing charges were provided by University Hospital Bonn Institute of Hygiene and Public Health.