Comparative Study of Histotripsy Pulse Parameters Used to Inactivate Escherichia coli in Suspension.
Bactericide
Boiling histotripsy
Cavitation histotripsy
Focused ultrasound
Histotripsy
Inactivation
Shock-scattering histotripsy
Journal
Ultrasound in medicine & biology
ISSN: 1879-291X
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Med Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410553
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2023
12 2023
Historique:
received:
21
03
2023
revised:
07
06
2023
accepted:
05
08
2023
pmc-release:
01
12
2024
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
18
9
2023
entrez:
17
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bacterial loads can be effectively reduced using cavitation-mediated focused ultrasound, or histotripsy. In this study, gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli) in suspension were used as model bacteria to evaluate the effectiveness of two regimens of histotripsy treatments: cavitation histotripsy (CH) and boiling histotripsy (BH). Ten-milliliter volumes of Escherichia coli were treated at different negative focal pressure amplitudes and over time periods up to 40 min. Cavitation activity was characterized with coaxial passive cavitation detection (PCD) and synchronized plane wave B-mode imaging. CH treatments exhibited a threshold behavior that was consistent with PCD metrics of cavitation. Above the threshold, bacterial inactivation followed a monotonically increasing log-linear relationship that indicated an exponential inactivation rate. BH exhibited no threshold, but instead followed a different monotonically increasing inactivation rate. Inactivation rates were larger for BH at or below the CH threshold, and larger for CH substantially above the threshold. CH studies performed at different pulse lengths at the same duty cycle had similar inactivation rates, suggesting that at any given pressure amplitude, the "on time" was the most important variable for inactivating E. coli. The maximum inactivation was produced by CH at the highest pressure amplitudes used, leading to a log reduction >4.2 for a 40 min treatment. The results of this study suggest that both CH and BH can be used to inactivate E. coli in suspension, with the optimal regimen depending on the attainable peak negative focal pressure at the target.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37718123
pii: S0301-5629(23)00251-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2023.08.004
pmc: PMC10591824
mid: NIHMS1931814
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2451-2458Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR080120
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB023910
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB031788
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM122859
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Oct;130(4):1888-98
pubmed: 21973343
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Sep;44(9):1996-2008
pubmed: 29941214
Int J Food Microbiol. 2003 Nov 1;87(3):207-16
pubmed: 14527793
Interface Focus. 2015 Oct 6;5(5):20150017
pubmed: 26442141
Phys Med Biol. 2017 Feb 7;62(3):843-857
pubmed: 28072580
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017 Oct;64(10):1420-1428
pubmed: 28650808
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017 Oct;64(10):1542-1557
pubmed: 28809681
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Jul;47(7):1920-1930
pubmed: 33902954
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Jul;40(7):1523-34
pubmed: 24613635
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2017 Feb;64(2):374-390
pubmed: 27775904
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008 Jun 30;60(10):1103-16
pubmed: 18468716
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:4467-70
pubmed: 19163706
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):3498-510
pubmed: 22088025
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022 Dec;69(12):3255-3269
pubmed: 36197870
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Nov;34(11):2271-85
pubmed: 25955583
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1476-1485
pubmed: 28454842
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Mar;47(3):603-619
pubmed: 33250219
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Sep;144(3):1160
pubmed: 30424663
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Dec;35(12):1982-94
pubmed: 19854563
J Bacteriol. 1929 May;17(5):373-6
pubmed: 16559370
Ultrason Sonochem. 2011 Jul;18(4):813-35
pubmed: 21216174
Ultrason Sonochem. 2014 Jan;21(1):15-22
pubmed: 23751458
Int J Food Microbiol. 1995 Dec;28(2):197-219
pubmed: 8750667
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Apr;44(4):909-914
pubmed: 29395679
Ultrason Sonochem. 2014 Jan;21(1):454-60
pubmed: 23845410