Predictors of Cerebral Embolic Debris During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The SafePass 2 First-in-Human Study.
Humans
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
/ adverse effects
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ complications
Prospective Studies
Atrial Fibrillation
/ complications
Risk Factors
Treatment Outcome
Embolism
/ epidemiology
Intracranial Embolism
/ epidemiology
Embolic Protection Devices
cerebral embolization
embolic protection
major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Journal
The American journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1879-1913
Titre abrégé: Am J Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0207277
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 11 2023
15 11 2023
Historique:
received:
03
08
2023
accepted:
21
08
2023
medline:
6
11
2023
pubmed:
19
9
2023
entrez:
18
9
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) generates significant debris, and strategies to mitigate cerebral embolization are needed. The novel Emboliner embolic protection catheter (Emboline, Inc., Santa Cruz, California) is designed to capture all particles generated during TAVR. This first-in-human study sought to assess the safety and feasibility of the device and to characterize the distribution and histopathology of the debris generated during TAVR. The SafePass 2 study was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, single-arm investigation of the Emboliner device. Primary end points included 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and technical performance. Computed tomography angiography was analyzed by an independent core laboratory, and filters were sent for histopathology of captured debris. Predictors of particle number were identified using >150 µm and >500 µm size thresholds. Of 31 subjects enrolled, technical success was 100%, and 30-day MACCE was 6.5% (2 cerebrovascular accidents, with 1 attributed to subtherapeutic dosing of rivaroxaban along with atrial fibrillation and the other to possible previous small ischemic strokes on magnetic resonance imaging; neither MACCE event had a causal relation to the Emboliner). All filters contained debris, with a median of 191.0 particles >150 µm and 14.0 particles >500 µm. Histopathology revealed mostly acute thrombus and valve or arterial tissue with lesser amounts of calcified tissue. A history of atrial fibrillation predicted a greater number of particles >500 µm (p = 0.0259) and its presence on admission was associated with 4.1 times more particles >150 µm (p = 0.0130) and 8.1 times more particles >500 µm (p = 0.0086). Self-expanding valves were associated with twice the number of particles >150 µm (p = 0.0281). TASK score was positively correlated with number of particles >500 µm (p = 0.0337). The Emboliner device was safe and feasible. Emboli after TAVR appear more numerous than previously documented. Atrial fibrillation, higher TASK score, and self-expanding valve use conferred higher embolic burden. Notably, none of the tested computed tomography angiography features were able to identify with higher embolic risk. Larger-scale studies are needed to identify high-risk patients for selective embolic protection device use.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37722198
pii: S0002-9149(23)00914-1
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.08.137
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
28-34Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Ahmad is a consultant for Cardiovascular Systems Inc and Shockwave; and serves on the medical advisory board of Boston Scientific. Dr. Leipsic serves at Institutional Core Lab - Edwards, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Pi-Cardia. Dr. Blanke is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences and LARALAB; Institutional Core Lab – Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Pi-Cardia. Dr. Webster receives institutional research funding – Emboline Inc. Dr. Nazif receives consulting fees or honoraria from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and EnCompass Technologies. Dr. Parise receives consulting fees – Intact Vascular, Inc. (now Philips Image Guided Therapy), TriReme Medical LLC, and Veryan Medical Ltd. Dr. Lansky receives consulting fees from Med Alliance. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare.